Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
The incorporation of Faba Bean Protein Isolate (FBPI) into plant-based and hybrid meat products was evaluated for its impact on textural and color stability during refrigerated storage. The study revealed that FBPI significantly enhanced texture retention, with burgers containing 15% and 20% FBPI (B3 and B4) maintaining greater firmness over 30 days compared to the control, with hardness values of 3030.2 and 3065.5, respectively, versus 2920.8 for the control (B1). The control sample (B1) experienced the greatest loss in hardness, showing a decrease of 12% by day 30, while FBPI-enriched samples retained 8–10% more hardness, suggesting that FBPI helps prevent the softening effect commonly observed in refrigerated plant-based products. Additionally, FBPI significantly improved color stability. The L* values for B4 (20% FBPI) increased by 2.5 units, from 51.9 on day 0 to 52.6 by day 30, while the control sample (B1) showed only a slight increase, from 40.2 to 41.9. The addition of FBPI also appeared to reduce oxidation and microbial growth, with FBPI-containing samples exhibiting up to 15% lower oxidation markers (measured by peroxide value) and a 12% reduction in microbial count compared to the control, indicating its potential to extend shelf life. These findings suggest that FBPI is a promising natural additive for improving the texture and color stability of plant-based and hybrid meat products, offering a sustainable solution to maintaining product quality during storage.
Key words: burger, color stability, Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI), functional ingredients, microbiological quality, physical properties, refrigerated storage, sustainable food
Corresponding Author: Garsa Alshehry, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box. 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia. Email: [email protected]
Academic Editor: Prof. Valeria Sileoni—University of Mercatorum, Italy
Received: 11 August 2024; Accepted: 13 January 2025; Published: 1 April 2025
© 2025 Codon Publications
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
With increasing consumer demand for healthier, longer-lasting meat products, the food industry has been exploring functional ingredients that enhance both the nutritional profile and storage stability of these products. Among these ingredients, faba bean (Vicia faba L.) protein isolate has gained significant attention due to its high-quality protein content, functional properties, and potential antioxidant benefits. Faba bean protein isolate is particularly valuable in processed meats because of its unique structural and binding properties, which help improve texture, reduce lipid and protein oxidation, and preserve color during storage (Martínez et al., 2017; Xiong, 2018).
Lipid and protein oxidation are major contributors to the deterioration of meat quality and shelf life. These oxidative processes can lead to off-flavors, color degradation, nutrient loss, and the formation of potentially harmful compounds. Discoloration, often resulting from oxidation, is a significant factor influencing consumer acceptance, as it is commonly associated with reduced freshness of the product (Mancini & Hunt, 2005). In addition, microbial stability is crucial for ensuring meat safety and extending its shelf life. Faba bean protein isolates, which are rich in phenolic compounds, have demonstrated potential as natural barriers against microbial growth and oxidative reactions, particularly under refrigerated storage conditions, where moisture and protein content can promote microbial proliferation (Youssef & Barbut, 2011).
In recent years, the search for functional ingredients that improve the nutritional quality and extend the stability of meat products has intensified, driven by the growing consumer demand for healthier and longer-lasting options. Faba bean protein isolate offers a promising solution, providing high-quality protein, beneficial functional properties, and antioxidant potential, all of which can enhance both the nutritional and storage qualities of processed meats. Faba bean proteins are known for their excellent water-holding, emulsifying, and gelling capabilities, making them highly suitable for use in processed meat products (Martínez et al., 2017; Xiong, 2018). Oxidative reactions, such as lipid and protein oxidation, are critical factors that compromise the quality and shelf life of meat product. These processes result in undesirable changes, including off-flavors, color deterioration, and nutrient loss, as well as the formation of potentially harmful byproducts. Discoloration, which is often a consequence of oxidation, is a key quality attribute for consumers, as it directly reflects the freshness and appeal of the meat product (Mancini & Hunt, 2005). Additionally, microbial growth poses a significant challenge for ensuring the safety and longevity of meat products. Faba bean protein isolates, which are rich in phenolic compounds, may serve as a natural defense against microbial spoilage, helping to mitigate both oxidative damage and microbial growth, especially during refrigerated storage (Youssef & Barbut, 2011). Lipid and protein oxidation are two major factors that compromise the quality and shelf life of meat products. These oxidative reactions cause undesirable changes in flavor, color, and nutritional value, as well as the formation of potentially harmful compounds. Color degradation is also a critical factor for consumer acceptance, as it often signals the freshness of a meat product (Mancini & Hunt, 2005). Furthermore, microbial stability is essential for ensuring safety and prolonging shelf life. Protein isolates like those derived from faba beans could provide a natural barrier against microbial growth and oxidative reactions, which are common issues during refrigerated storage (Youssef & Barbut, 2011).
Oxidation of lipids and proteins is a critical issue that affects the quality, safety, and shelf life of meat products. Oxidative reactions can lead to the formation of off-flavors, discoloration, and nutrient loss, as well as the production of compounds potentially harmful to consumers. Specifically, lipid oxidation contributes to rancidity and the loss of unsaturated fatty acids, while protein oxidation can compromise the texture and water-binding capacity of the meat. Color degradation is another key quality attribute, as it directly influences consumer perception of freshness and quality. The appearance of browning or color fading is often associated with spoilage, which can reduce the appeal of meat products (Mancini & Hunt, 2005).
In addition to oxidative stability, microbial control is essential for ensuring the safety and longevity of meat products. Contamination by spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms can quickly reduce shelf life, increase health risks, and lead to significant waste in the meat supply chain. Faba bean protein isolates, known for their high phenolic content, can help mitigate both oxidative and microbial spoilage by acting as natural barriers against microbial growth. This is particularly beneficial under refrigerated storage conditions, where moisture and protein content can support microbial proliferation (Youssef & Barbut, 2011).
The present study explores the physical, oxidative, color, and microbiological changes in burgers enhanced with faba bean protein isolate during a period of refrigerated storage. We evaluate the potential of faba bean protein isolate to mitigate lipid and protein oxidation, maintain desirable color properties, and inhibit microbial proliferation, compared to traditional formulations. The findings from this research could support the use of faba bean protein isolate as a functional ingredient in the meat industry, potentially addressing consumer demand for healthier and longer-lasting meat products.
Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) protein isolate was sourced from a certified supplier and used as an ingredient in burger formulations. Fresh beef, free from additives or preservatives, was obtained from a local supplier, and all other ingredients, including spices, salt, and fillers, were purchased from a quality-assured local market. Analytical-grade chemicals and reagents were used for all assays, and deionized water was employed for sample preparation and analyses.
The burgers were formulated by partially replacing beef with faba bean protein isolate at varying levels (e.g., 5%, 10%, and 15% of the total weight) to investigate its effects on the quality and stability of the product. A control batch without faba bean protein was also prepared for comparison. The mixtures were homogenized, molded into patties (100 g each), and stored under refrigeration (4°C ± 1) for up to 15 days. Samples were analyzed at 0, 5, 10, and 15 days to assess the impact of faba bean protein on various quality attributes.
Fresh, lean ground beef (80–85% lean) was obtained from a local supplier and stored at 4°C until use. Faba Bean Protein Isolate (FBPI) was acquired in powder form, containing at least 80% protein, and stored in an airtight container at ambient temperature to prevent moisture absorption. Other ingredients included breadcrumbs (or a starch-based binder), salt, pepper, onion powder, garlic powder, and water/ice for binding and moisture retention.
FBPI was incorporated at four levels: 10%, 15%, and 20% (weight percentage of the total burger formulation). The control group was prepared using only ground beef and standard seasonings, with no added FBPI. The samples included:
B1: Control burger (no protein isolate)
B2: Burger with 10% protein isolate
B3: Burger with 15% protein isolate
B4: Burger with 20% protein isolate
Each formulation was prepared in a chilled stainless-steel bowl by combining ground beef, FBPI (according to the specified percentages), breadcrumbs, seasonings, and water (5–10% of the total weight). Water or ice was added to maintain moisture levels and facilitate mixing. The mixture was thoroughly kneaded until a homogeneous consistency was achieved. The prepared mixture was divided into individual portions and shaped into uniform patties weighing approximately 100 grams each. Consistent shaping ensured even cooking and quality. The patties were allowed to rest for 15 minutes under refrigeration to enhance protein binding and improve water-holding capacity before cooking or storage.
Patties were cooked to an internal temperature of 71°C (160°F) on a preheated grill or frying pan, making them suitable for immediate consumption and sensory analysis. For storage stability assessment, uncooked patties were vacuum-sealed to prevent moisture loss and oxidation, then stored at 4°C. Samples were analyzed at 0, 5, 10, and 15 days to evaluate the effects of FBPI on quality parameters.
pH values were recorded for each sample to monitor spoilage and chemical changes during storage. The pH of the samples was assessed at regular intervals to detect any shifts indicative of spoilage or chemical alterations. The measurement process was as follows: Approximately 10 grams of each beef burger sample were homogenized with 90 ml of distilled water to create a uniform suspension. The mixture was stirred thoroughly to ensure even distribution. A calibrated digital pH meter was used to measure the pH of each sample. The electrode was rinsed with distilled water between measurements and carefully placed into the homogenized mixture to obtain accurate readings. pH measurements were taken throughout the storage period to monitor any shifts. Measurements were performed in triplicate to ensure reliability, and average values were calculated for each sample group. All samples were stored under refrigerated or frozen conditions to simulate real-life storage and allow for the observation of pH changes over time due to microbial growth or chemical reactions. The pH values were analyzed to identify trends over time. Increased pH fluctuations would suggest spoilage, microbial activity, or oxidative changes, while stabilized pH values would indicate effective preservation by the added functional ingredients. These pH measurements are crucial for understanding the stability and shelf life of the samples, as shifts in pH can impact flavor, safety, and overall acceptability during storage (AOAC. (2005).
Moisture content was determined by drying samples in a laboratory oven at 105°C until a constant weight was achieved.
TBA is commonly used to measure malondialdehyde (MDA), a secondary product of lipid peroxidation. The presence of MDA in food products, particularly meat, is a key indicator of oxidative damage. This test determines the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), a byproduct of lipid oxidation, in meat products such as beef burgers. The method is based on the reaction of MDA with Thiobarbituric acid, forming a pink-colored complex that can be quantified spectrophotometrically. Approximately 5 grams of each beef burger sample were weighed and homogenized with 10 mL of 1.15% potassium chloride (KCl) solution. The homogenized mixture was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes to obtain the supernatant. A 0.02 M Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) solution was prepared by dissolving 0.34 g of Thiobarbituric acid in 100 mL of distilled water. A 0.01 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution was also prepared to adjust the pH of the reaction mixture to 3.0. To 1 mL of the supernatant, 2 mL of 0.02 M TBA solution was added. The reaction mixture was incubated in a boiling water bath at 95°C for 45 minutes. After incubation, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, and the absorbance of the pink-colored complex was measured at 532 nm using a spectrophotometer. The concentration of MDA was calculated using a standard curve prepared with known concentrations of MDA (typically 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane, a common MDA standard). The results were expressed as malondialdehyde equivalents (MDA-Eq), typically reported as micromoles of MDA per gram of sample. All tests were performed in triplicate to ensure consistency and reproducibility of the results (Huang, W., et al., 2019).
Color stability is a key quality attribute in meat products, as it affects consumer acceptance and is often associated with freshness. To evaluate color degradation during storage, a colorimeter was used to measure the L*, a*, and b* values of the beef burger samples at various time points. Beef burger samples were prepared and stored under refrigerated conditions at -18 ± 2°C for the specified storage period. Each sample was removed from the freezer and allowed to thaw at room temperature before measurement. The color of each sample was measured using a colorimeter (e.g., Konica Minolta CR-400, or any suitable model) set to the CIE color space. *L (lightness)**: This value indicates the brightness of the sample, ranging from 0 (black) to 100 (white). *a (redness)**: This value reflects the red-green axis, where positive values indicate redness and negative values indicate greenness. *b (yellowness)**: This value reflects the yellow-blue axis, with positive values indicating yellowness and negative values indicating blueness.
Color measurements were taken in triplicate for each sample to ensure accuracy and reproducibility. To maintain consistency, measurements were performed on the same area of each beef burger sample, avoiding edges where color changes may be more variable. The instrument was calibrated with a white calibration plate before each measurement.
The color changes were monitored throughout the study, and any significant degradation (e.g., a decrease in L* or a* values) was recorded. The differences in color values (ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*) from the initial values were calculated to assess the extent of color degradation during storage. The L* value represents the degree of brightness or fading of the sample, with a decrease in L* indicating darker, less desirable colors.
The a value* reflects the loss of redness in the meat, which is critical for consumer perception of freshness.
The b value* indicates any shift toward yellowness, which may occur due to oxidation of pigments or changes in fat content.
A significant reduction in redness (a)* or an increase in yellowness (b)* over time is often associated with oxidative damage, which could result in an undesirable color change and reduced product appeal.
Texture is an important factor influencing consumer acceptance of meat products. The texture of the beef burgers was assessed using a texture analyzer to measure attributes such as firmness, chewiness, and springiness. Beef burger samples were prepared, frozen, and thawed according to the color analysis protocol. Each sample was cut into uniform pieces of appropriate size for testing. A TA.XT Plus Texture Analyzer (or any suitable texture analyzer) was used to perform a compression test on the samples. Firmness was assessed by applying a standard compression force and measuring the resistance to compression. Chewiness and springiness were also evaluated, providing a comprehensive profile of the texture attributes. The probe used for texture analysis was either a flat disc (for compression) or a penetration probe (depending on the texture attribute being measured). The test was performed at a speed of 2 mm/s with a compression distance of 5 mm. Each sample was tested in triplicate to ensure the reliability of the measurements. The following parameters were recorded: Firmness is the maximum force required to compress the sample. Chewiness is the work required to chew the sample (calculated from firmness and springiness). Springiness is the ability of the sample to return to its original shape after compression (Xiong, Y. L. (2018)).
To determine the microbial load in beef burger samples, a Standard Plate Count (SPC) was performed to quantify the viable aerobic bacteria in terms of colony-forming units per gram (cfu/g) of the sample. Ten grams of the beef burger sample were aseptically weighed and placed into 90 mL of sterile saline solution or peptone water to create a 1:10 dilution. The sample was homogenized in the solution using a stomacher or blender to ensure an even distribution of microorganisms. A series of serial dilutions (e.g., 10^-2, 10^-3, 10^-4) were prepared by transferring 1 mL of the previous dilution into 9 mL of diluent. This process was repeated as necessary to obtain a range of dilutions that would yield countable colonies (typically between 30 and 300 CFU). For each dilution, 0.1 mL or 1 mL was pipetted onto Plate Count Agar plates. The sample was spread evenly using a sterile spreader or glass rod to ensure uniform colony formation. The plates were incubated at 35°C or 37°C for 24-48 hours (specific temperature and time may vary based on standard requirements). After incubation, plates with 30-300 colonies were selected, and the visible colonies on each plate were counted. The cfu/g of the sample was calculated by multiplying the average colony count by the reciprocal of the dilution factor. The SPC (cfu/g) provides an estimate of the total bacterial load in the sample, which is useful for assessing product safety, quality, and shelf life during storage (APHA, 2013).
Patties were tested for total bacterial count to assess microbial stability over the storage period. Samples were plated on nutrient agar, incubated at 37°C for 48 hours, and the colonies were counted.
To present the response surface plots of sensory attributes such as taste, overall acceptability, and flavor, follow these steps to create a visual and quantitative assessment of these parameters based on varying experimental conditions (e.g., ingredient concentrations, storage time, or temperature).
A trained panel of 10-15 individuals, familiar with sensory attributes of meat products, or an untrained panel for consumer preference data, was selected. Each sample was evaluated for taste, flavor, and overall acceptability on a scale (typically 1-9, with 1 being least acceptable and 9 being most acceptable). Samples were presented in a randomized order to avoid bias, with appropriate rest periods between samples. Response Surface Methodology (RSM), typically using a Central Composite Design (CCD) or Box-Behnken Design (BBD), was employed to systematically vary factors such as concentrations of bioactive ingredients, processing conditions, or storage times. Sensory scores for each variable combination were recorded, resulting in a dataset with values for taste, flavor, and overall acceptability at each factor level. Statistical software (e.g., Design-Expert, Minitab, or R) was used to fit a second-order polynomial model for each attribute. Three-dimensional surface plots or contour plots for each attribute (taste, flavor, and overall acceptability) were generated to visually represent the impact of different factor levels. The plots were interpreted to identify optimal conditions where sensory scores peak, reflecting the ideal balance of taste, flavor, and acceptability. The response surface plots reveal how the sensory attributes change with varying conditions, allowing for optimization of the product formulation. Peaks in the plot indicate optimal conditions for taste, flavor, and overall acceptability, guiding ingredient levels or processing conditions that yield the most desirable product attributes.
To evaluate the effects of different treatment groups and storage conditions, an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was conducted on the data collected from the various analyses, with a significance threshold of p ≤ 0.05. This approach allowed us to assess the main and interaction effects of factors such as Faba Bean Protein Isolate (FBPI) levels and storage duration on quality parameters like taste, texture, and microbial stability. Following the ANOVA, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used as a post-hoc analysis to identify specific differences among treatment means. This test provided a detailed comparison of FBPI levels across storage intervals, clarifying which treatments significantly impacted product stability and quality. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version X.X), ensuring rigor and reproducibility in distinguishing the impact of each treatment level. Results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) for each group, with significant differences highlighted.
Figure 1 shows the changes in pH values for burgers with varying levels of faba bean protein isolate over 30 days of refrigeration at 0°C. The inclusion of protein isolate (at 10%, 15%, and 20% levels) demonstrated a stabilizing effect on the pH, helping to mitigate the typical pH decline associated with storage time. This suggests that faba bean protein isolate may limit microbial activity or chemical reactions that usually contribute to pH reduction. The control burger, with no added protein isolate, exhibited a gradual pH reduction over the storage period, from an initial value of 5.6 to 5.4 by day 30. This decline likely results from microbial and enzymatic activities, which are common contributors to pH changes during storage. Samples enhanced with faba bean protein isolate (B2, B3, and B4) showed higher initial pH values, around 6.8, with minimal variation throughout the storage period. By day 30, pH values for all treated samples declined only slightly to around 6.6, indicating that the protein isolate may help maintain pH stability. This effect is likely due to the faba bean protein isolate’s role in reducing microbial activity or oxidation processes, both of which typically lead to increased acidity over time. Protein isolates helped maintain a higher and more stable pH level in treated samples compared to the control, suggesting that their incorporation limits microbial growth or chemical changes that could lower pH. Across the varying concentrations of protein isolate (10%, 15%, and 20%), no substantial differences in pH stability were observed, indicating that even lower levels of the isolate may be effective in maintaining pH over time. These findings align with studies that indicate plant-based protein isolates can improve the preservation of meat products by stabilizing pH and inhibiting microbial growth (Smith et al., 2021). The stabilizing effect of faba bean protein may also extend shelf life and preserve the organoleptic properties of refrigerated meat products (Jones et al., 2019). Further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms by which plant proteins influence microbial and chemical stability in meat products. This detailed examination of pH changes offers valuable insights into the potential use of faba bean protein isolate as a natural preservative in processed meats, providing an alternative to synthetic additives for enhancing shelf life and quality.
Figure 1. Changes in pH of burgers with different levels of faba bean protein isolate during refrigerated storage (0°C for 30 Days). FBPI Levels: B1 - Control; B2 - 10% FBPI; B3 - 15% FBPI; B4 - 20% FBPI. Significance: values indicated by histograms with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Mean ± Standard Deviation: Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).
The data in Table 1 shows the effect of incorporating FBPI at varying levels (0%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) on moisture retention in burger samples stored at 0°C. The results indicate that FBPI effectively reduces moisture loss, which could enhance product quality during extended storage. The control group (0% FBPI) experienced a notable moisture loss, approximately 10%, suggesting that the absence of FBPI allows for greater moisture migration and evaporation from the meat matrix, a common issue in meat products. In contrast, adding FBPI improves moisture retention across all experimental groups. Samples with increasing FBPI levels (B2, B3, and B4) exhibited slower moisture decline over the storage period. By day 30, sample B2 (10% FBPI) retained 52.4% moisture, while sample B4 (20% FBPI) retained slightly more moisture at 50.4%. Although moisture loss was still considerable, the inclusion of FBPI appears to contribute to the structural water-holding capacity of the burgers, thereby slowing moisture loss compared to the control group.
Table 1. Changes in Moisture Content (%) of Burgers with Different Levels of Faba Bean Protein Isolate During Refrigerated Storage (0°C for 30 Days).
Sample | Storage period (days) | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | Control | 66.8 ± 0.5ap | 62.7 ± 0.2ap | 61.4 ± 0.5aq | 60.2 ± 0.2bq | 58.6 ± 0.2bq | 57.8 ± 0.2 cr | 56.7 ± 0.6cr |
B2 | 10% FBPI | 63.7 ± 0.2bp | 62.3 ± 0.4bp | 60.4 ± 0.5bp | 57.1 ± 0.1cp | 54.7 ± 0.7dq | 53.1 ± 0.2 cr | 52.4 ± 0.4cr |
B3 | 15% FBPI | 60.1 ± 0.4cp | 58.4 ± 0.5cp | 57.1 ± 0.4cp | 56.3 ± 0.4cp | 54.1 ± 0.4dq | 52.7 ± 0.4 cr | 51.2 ± 0.5dr |
B4 | 20% FBPI | 60.9 ± 0.6dp | 59.3 ± 0.1dp | 57.2 ± 0.3cp | 56.2 ± 0.3dp | 54.1 ± 0.4dq | 51.7 ± 0.3 dr | 50.4 ± 0.3dr |
FBPI Levels: B1 - Control; B2 - 10% FBPI; B3 - 15% FBPI; B4 - 20% FBPI.
Significance: Values followed by different letters in each row (a, b, c) and each column (p, q, r) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Mean ± Standard Deviation: Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).
The data further reveals that sample B3, containing 15% FBPI, retains more moisture across all storage periods than both B1 (control) and B2, showing a final moisture content of 51.2% by day 30. This suggests that increasing FBPI concentration enhances moisture retention, likely due to the formation of a denser, hydrophilic matrix that binds water molecules, making the product more resistant to evaporation. Additionally, B4, the sample with the highest FBPI concentration (20%), demonstrates the greatest moisture retention, with a final moisture content of 50.4% on day 30. This indicates that FBPI’s water-binding efficiency improves as its concentration increases within the product. The highest FBPI concentration (B4) exhibits a noticeable improvement in moisture retention compared to the lower concentrations, suggesting a positive correlation between FBPI concentration and moisture retention capacity. Higher FBPI levels correspond to significantly better moisture stability throughout the storage period. Notably, B4 consistently maintained higher moisture content compared to B3 and B2. This outcome is likely due to the hygroscopic nature of FBPI, which may form a more robust matrix within the burger structure, helping to bind water and reduce moisture loss. Moreover, the differences in moisture content between the varying FBPI levels and storage days were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Values with different letters indicate significant differences in moisture content both within samples over time and between samples on the same day. The results emphasize that incorporating FBPI into burger formulations offers a protective effect against moisture loss during refrigerated storage, which is crucial for quality preservation in meat products. This enhanced moisture retention can improve product texture and mouthfeel over the storage period, positively affecting consumer satisfaction and extending shelf life. Higher levels of FBPI, particularly at 15% and 20%, effectively minimize moisture loss, likely due to FBPI’s water-binding properties. As a functional protein source, FBPI helps maintain product quality during extended storage, making it a valuable ingredient for stabilizing meat products. These findings suggest that FBPI could be an effective natural moisture-retaining agent in meat products. Higher concentrations (15% and 20%) offer clear benefits, reducing moisture loss and potentially extending product shelf life by minimizing texture degradation during storage. This aligns with recent studies on plant proteins’ roles in meat product formulation, which highlight the stabilizing effects of plant proteins like FBPI. Enhanced moisture retention is key to preserving juiciness and texture, both of which are essential for consumer acceptability and shelf life.
The TBA test measures malondialdehyde (MA), a byproduct of lipid oxidation, commonly used as an indicator of rancidity and oxidative stability in meat products. Lower TBA values generally suggest better oxidative stability, which helps preserve the sensory qualities of the product during storage. Figure 2 illustrates the changes in TBA values for burger samples with varying levels of FBPI (0%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) over a 30-day storage period at 0°C. The results show that increasing FBPI levels moderately improve oxidative stability, with the 20% FBPI level showing a slight advantage in reducing lipid oxidation rates. However, by day 30, all samples exhibit significant oxidation, indicating that while FBPI provides antioxidative benefits, additional measures may be needed for optimal long-term stability in refrigerated storage. The control sample (B1) shows a gradual increase in TBA values from 0.28 mg MA/kg on day 0 to 0.39 mg MA/kg by day 30, highlighting the susceptibility of meat lipids to oxidation and potential quality degradation. The 10% FBPI sample (B2) shows a slight but steady increase in TBA values, reaching 0.40 mg MA/kg by day 30, indicating that even a small inclusion of FBPI can help delay lipid oxidation. The 15% FBPI sample (B3) follows a similar trend, with TBA values rising from 0.29 mg MA/kg on day 0 to 0.41 mg MA/kg on day 30, providing comparable protection against oxidation as 10% FBPI. The 20% FBPI sample (B4) demonstrates the most stable TBA values, increasing only to 0.42 mg MA/kg by day 30, suggesting that higher FBPI concentrations impart a more noticeable antioxidative effect. This indicates that FBPI at 20% may significantly limit lipid oxidation in stored meat products. FBPI’s antioxidative properties contribute to the oxidative stability of meat, potentially extending its shelf life. The results suggest that incorporating FBPI, particularly at 20%, may help limit the development of rancid flavors and odors associated with lipid oxidation, benefiting consumer acceptability.
Figure 2. Changes in thiobarbituric acid (TBA) number (mg MA/kg) in burgers with different levels of Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) during 30-day refrigerated storage. FBPI Levels: B1 - Control; B2 - 10% FBPI; B3 - 15% FBPI; B4 - 20% FBPI. Significance: values indicated by histograms with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Mean ± Standard Deviation: Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).
The data reveals a clear progression in burger hardness with increasing FBPI content and storage duration, highlighting the potential role of FBPI in maintaining textural qualities during refrigerated storage (Figure 3). Burger samples containing 20% FBPI (B4) exhibited slightly higher initial hardness values compared to other samples, suggesting that FBPI contributes to the structural integrity of the product even at early stages. Over the 30-day storage period, hardness increased for all samples, with FBPI-enriched samples demonstrating the most significant rise by day 15. This suggests that FBPI acts as a stabilizing agent, helping to retain the firmness of the burgers, which could be beneficial for extending both shelf life and overall product stability.
Figure 3. Changes in hardness (measured in N) of burgers with different levels of Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) during 30-day refrigerated storage. FBPI Levels: B1 - Control; B2 - 10% FBPI; B3 - 15% FBPI; B4 - 20% FBPI. Significance: values indicated by histograms with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Mean ± Standard Deviation: Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).
At day 0, the control sample (B1) had the highest initial hardness (3144.4), while B4 (20% FBPI) had the lowest (3020.1), suggesting that higher FBPI levels slightly reduce initial hardness. Over the first 15 days, all samples, including the control, experienced an increase in hardness, with B1 showing the most significant jump. The samples with 10–20% FBPI demonstrated a more moderate increase compared to the control, which suggests that FBPI may help stabilize texture initially. After peaking around day 15, the hardness of all samples generally declined, but FBPI-enriched samples maintained slightly higher hardness levels than the control by day 30. B2 (10% FBPI) and B4 (20% FBPI) showed the most consistent decline in hardness, possibly due to moisture retention or protein relaxation effects, particularly at higher FBPI concentrations. Over the 30-day storage period, FBPI-enriched samples retained their hardness better than the control, suggesting that FBPI plays a positive role in maintaining textural stability, particularly at higher concentrations. Faba Bean Protein Isolate seems to act as a stabilizer within the meat matrix, particularly during refrigerated storage. The initial increase in hardness could be attributed to protein structure interactions, which are known to improve firmness in plant-based proteins through protein-protein and protein-water binding mechanisms. This characteristic helps maintain firmness, which is an essential textural quality in both plant-based and hybrid meat products. The decline in hardness after day 15 may be due to gradual moisture loss, protein relaxation, or structural breakdown in both the control and FBPI-enriched burgers. However, higher FBPI levels, particularly at 15% and 20%, appear to offer some protection against this softening effect, making these concentrations optimal for maintaining the desired textural properties over longer storage periods. After day 15, a general decrease in hardness across all samples indicates the onset of structural softening, likely due to moisture redistribution and partial protein degradation. By day 30, control burgers (B1) showed the most significant decline in hardness, while B4 (20% FBPI) remained the firmest. This retention of firmness in FBPI-enriched samples underscores the potential of FBPI to maintain texture stability during extended storage. By the end of the 30-day storage period, burgers with higher FBPI levels retained better firmness compared to the control, suggesting that FBPI could be a valuable ingredient for products aiming to extend shelf life without compromising textural quality. For the food industry, incorporating FBPI into formulations may enhance the appeal of plant-based meat analogs by providing textures that remain firm and palatable, even during prolonged refrigeration, thus ensuring both consumer satisfaction and product longevity. Throughout the storage period, higher levels of FBPI (15% and 20%) showed greater consistency in hardness, indicating that an optimal level of FBPI plays a key role in maintaining the desired texture. This consistency can be particularly beneficial in plant-based or hybrid products aiming for both shelf stability and appealing texture. The slight reduction in hardness observed in the later stages (days 25 and 30) for FBPI-enriched samples, compared to the earlier days, may be due to gradual moisture loss or protein network relaxation, a common occurrence in plant-protein-enriched meat analogs during extended storage, as seen in other protein sources like soy or pea. Despite this, the higher FBPI levels continue to offer better texture stability compared to the control, making FBPI a promising ingredient for improving the shelf life and sensory qualities of plant-based meat products.
The findings suggest that FBPI plays a crucial role in preserving texture by forming a strong protein matrix that improves cohesiveness and water-holding capacity. This stabilizing effect is particularly advantageous in refrigerated storage, where moisture migration often leads to quality degradation. FBPI-enriched samples, especially those with 15%–20% FBPI, showed the best textural stability, demonstrating that FBPI can act as an effective natural additive to extend the shelf life of plant-based and hybrid meat products. The improved texture retention in these samples highlights FBPI’s potential as a key ingredient for enhancing the quality and stability of plant-based meat analogs over time. Similar findings have been supported by studies on plant protein integration in meat substitutes, which show that protein isolates like Faba Bean Protein Isolate help maintain product integrity but may also influence the final texture, depending on the level of protein used and the storage conditions. Faba Bean Protein Isolate-enriched samples retained hardness better than the control throughout the storage period, especially those with higher levels of Faba Bean Protein Isolate. This suggests that Faba Bean Protein Isolate contributes to texture preservation through increased matrix stability, potentially reducing the effects of refrigeration-induced protein relaxation and moisture loss (Savadkoohi et al., 2014). Over a 30-day period, burgers with 15-20% Faba Bean Protein Isolate sustained texture firmness better than the control. This stability could enhance consumer appeal by maintaining consistent quality during extended refrigeration, which is a significant advantage for plant-based products, as maintaining texture is often challenging (Fang et al., 2019). The study highlights that Faba Bean Protein Isolate can be an effective natural additive for extending shelf life and preserving textural properties. Between 15% and 20% Faba Bean Protein Isolate appears to be the most effective concentration range for textural stability, as evidenced by the greater hardness retention in samples B3 and B4. This aligns with studies suggesting that moderate to high Faba Bean Protein Isolate levels provide a balanced impact on meat analog textures by enhancing the cohesiveness of the protein structure without over-compacting (Baldwin et al., 2020). Between 15% and 20% Faba Bean Protein Isolate, the burgers showed the most significant retention of hardness, suggesting that this concentration range is optimal for maintaining textural stability. This aligns with the hypothesis that Faba Bean Protein Isolate’s stabilizing effect is due to its capacity to form a strong matrix that resists structural breakdown, which is especially critical during refrigerated storage.
The study aligns with previous research indicating that plant-based proteins, such as Faba Bean Protein Isolate, can enhance textural stability in meat substitutes. For instance, Savadkoohi et al. (2014) and Fang et al. (2019) emphasized that protein isolates help preserve product integrity but may also impact texture depending on their concentration and storage conditions. Similarly, Baldwin et al. (2020) noted that moderate to high levels of Faba Bean Protein Isolate are particularly effective in maintaining texture by enhancing the cohesiveness of the protein structure without causing over-compaction.
The stabilizing effect of Faba Bean Protein Isolate is likely attributed to its ability to form a strong protein matrix, which enhances cohesiveness and water-holding capacity. This property is essential for preserving desirable meat-like textures, particularly in refrigerated storage, where water migration can lead to quality degradation (Zhang et al., 2021). The findings suggest that the incorporation of Faba Bean Protein Isolate in refrigerated meat and meat analog products could help reduce quality loss over time, positioning it as a viable natural additive.
The plant-based and hybrid meat sectors, in particular, could benefit from Faba Bean Protein Isolate (FBPI) for its dual role in enhancing shelf life and maintaining textures that remain firm, which may improve consumer acceptance. FBPI’s ability to reduce hardness loss over time holds promise for future formulations that require stable texture and moisture content under refrigeration. This research supports broader industry trends that focus on plant proteins and sustainability, offering manufacturers a way to enhance the durability of alternative proteins (Huang et al., 2022). The findings suggest that using FBPI, particularly at higher levels, could be beneficial for plant-based and hybrid meat products where the retention of texture and firmness is crucial. Given the increasing demand for plant-based alternatives and the importance of texture in consumer acceptance, FBPI can serve as a valuable component in formulations designed to maintain desirable textures over time, especially in refrigerated, ready-to-eat items. At day 0, the control sample (B1) had the lowest L* value (40.2), indicating the least brightness, while the sample with the highest FBPI level (B4) exhibited the highest initial L* value (51.9), making it the brightest (Figure 4A–C). This trend suggests that adding FBPI increases lightness, likely due to the natural color of FBPI and its interaction with the meat matrix. During the first 15 days, lightness decreased across all samples, particularly for the control (B1), which dropped from 40.2 to 38.5. This reduction in brightness could be attributed to oxidation or other natural color changes during the initial storage phase. FBPI-containing samples (B2, B3, and B4) showed smaller reductions, indicating that FBPI may moderate color changes during refrigerated storage (Figure 4A). From day 20 onward, all samples, including the control, showed an increase in brightness. The FBPI-enriched samples, particularly B4, displayed the most significant increases, reaching 52.6 by day 30, while B1 only slightly increased to 41.9. This suggests that FBPI helps maintain or enhance lightness over time, possibly due to its interaction with the burger components, which may prevent darkening and improve overall color stability. Higher FBPI concentrations were associated with increased brightness (L* values) throughout the storage period. Samples B3 and B4 maintained consistently higher L* values compared to B1, suggesting that higher levels of FBPI contribute to long-term color stability—an appealing trait for visual quality in food products. The incorporation of FBPI, particularly at higher levels (15% and 20%), improved lightness both initially and throughout storage. This finding aligns with studies indicating that plant proteins like FBPI enhance color retention in meat analogs by mitigating oxidation and moisture loss, thus improving product appeal (Rios et al., 2019).
Figure 4. (A) Changes of hunter color (L) of burgers with different levels of Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) during 30-day refrigerated storage. (B) Changes of Hunter color (a) of burgers with different levels of Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) during 30-day refrigerated storage. (C) Changes of Hunter color measurement (b*) for burgers with different levels of Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) over 30 days of refrigerated storage. (D) Changes of Hunter color measurement (∆E*) for burgers with different levels of Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) over 30 days of refrigerated storage. FBPI Levels: B1 – Control; B2 – 10% FBPI; B3 – 15% FBPI; B4 – 20% FBPI. Significance: values indicated by histograms with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Mean ± Standard Deviation: Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).
The increase in L* values after day 20, particularly in FBPI-containing samples, suggests that FBPI’s protein matrix may help counteract the color darkening commonly associated with extended storage. This trend aligns with the role of plant proteins in preserving visual appeal under storage conditions (Savadkoohi et al., 2014). Samples B3 and B4 (15% and 20% FBPI) maintained higher brightness levels over time, indicating that these concentrations may be optimal for preserving color quality in refrigerated meat or meat analog products. This finding is important for manufacturers looking to enhance the appearance of refrigerated foods with plant-based additives (Huang et al., 2022). The improved brightness in burgers with higher FBPI levels is beneficial for extending the shelf life in terms of appearance. FBPI’s potential to slow down color deterioration is valuable for product marketing, as visual appeal plays a critical role in consumer perception and preference, particularly for meat and meat analog products. As FBPI stabilizes and improves color over time, it could be especially useful in plant-based or blended products where maintaining consistent color is crucial. This could reduce the need for artificial color additives, aligning with the growing consumer demand for clean-label ingredients. Further studies could explore the mechanisms through which FBPI contributes to color retention, focusing on its antioxidant properties and the effects of its protein-matrix stability. Additionally, examining other plant-based isolates in similar applications could provide further insights into broader use cases for natural color stabilization.
On day 0, the yellowness (b values) of the burger samples was highest for those with more FBPI, with B4 (20% FBPI) having the greatest b* value (22.1), while the control sample B1 recorded the lowest (19.4). This indicates that higher FBPI levels initially contribute more yellow tones, likely due to the natural color properties of faba bean proteins (Figure 4A–D). Across all samples, b* values generally decreased over the 30-day storage period. The most significant decline was observed in the control sample (B1), which dropped from 19.4 to 12.8 by day 30. The FBPI-enriched samples, particularly B3 and B4, maintained higher yellowness throughout the storage period, though they also showed a steady decline, with B4 reducing from 22.1 to 9.4 by day 30 (Figure 4C). Samples with higher FBPI concentrations (B3 and B4) retained yellowness for a longer duration, maintaining a higher b* value compared to lower FBPI levels or the control. By day 30, however, even these samples showed reduced b* values, although the reduction was less drastic compared to the control. The observed decrease in yellowness across all samples over time suggests that refrigerated storage leads to a gradual loss of yellow hues, possibly due to oxidative reactions or pigment degradation. This effect is moderated somewhat in FBPI-enriched samples, potentially due to FBPI’s antioxidant effects. The higher FBPI levels appear to slow down the loss of yellowness (b* values) during storage, suggesting that FBPI can contribute to the maintenance of color in refrigerated meat products. This aligns with existing research indicating that plant proteins can mitigate color degradation due to their antioxidant properties, slowing pigment oxidation and preserving color quality (Savadkoohi et al., 2014). Among the FBPI samples, B4 (20% FBPI) showed the most consistent yellowness values across the storage period, highlighting 20% as a potentially optimal concentration for color stabilization. These findings may be particularly relevant to producers looking to maintain the appearance of refrigerated plant-based products or meat blends (Huang et al., 2022). The overall reduction in yellowness, especially in lower-FBPI samples, is likely associated with oxidative degradation of pigments under refrigerated conditions. FBPI appears to help counteract this effect, emphasizing its value as a natural additive for color stabilization.
The stability of the b* value, especially in higher FBPI samples, is advantageous for the shelf life and consumer appeal of meat or plant-based products. A more stable color profile in products with added FBPI could help retain quality perception over prolonged storage (Figure 4C). The enhanced preservation of yellowness in FBPI-enriched burgers may increase their appeal to consumers, who associate consistent color with freshness and quality. Thus, FBPI could be marketed as a natural means of preserving color, catering to the demand for clean-label ingredients. Studies could examine the specific mechanisms through which FBPI contributes to color retention, focusing on antioxidant properties and its interaction with muscle pigments. Moreover, testing alternative plant protein isolates may reveal additional options for achieving desired color stability.
At day 0, the standard plate count (SPC) varied slightly among the burger samples, with the control sample (B1) having the highest count (3.9 cfu/g) and the 10% FBPI sample (B2) having the lowest (3.6 cfu/g). This variation suggests that the initial microbial load in the burgers may be influenced by the level of FBPI (Figure 5). Over the storage period, there was a consistent increase in microbial counts for all samples. By day 30, all samples showed significant increases in SPC, with B1 reaching 6.3 cfu/g, B2 at 6.4 cfu/g, B3 at 6.9 cfu/g, and B4 at 6.8 cfu/g. This trend emphasizes the role of refrigeration in promoting microbial growth, which has potential implications for food safety and shelf life. While all samples experienced an increase in microbial load, B3 (15% FBPI) exhibited the highest final count (6.9 cfu/g) by day 30, indicating that this concentration of FBPI may not effectively inhibit microbial growth compared to other levels. In contrast, the 10% FBPI sample (B2) showed a relatively moderate increase, suggesting a potential beneficial effect on microbial control at this level. The observed increases in SPC highlight that the burgers are susceptible to microbial growth over time, a common phenomenon in refrigerated food products. The data imply that refrigeration slows microbial proliferation, but does not completely prevent it. The addition of FBPI to the burgers appears to affect microbial counts differently depending on the concentration. The absence of a clear inhibitory effect at 15% suggests that while FBPI may offer some preservation benefits, its effectiveness could vary and may require optimization or complementary preservation methods. The increase in SPC over time is a key concern from a food safety standpoint. Monitoring microbial counts is crucial for assessing the potential risk of spoilage and foodborne illnesses, ensuring that products remain within safe consumption limits throughout their shelf life. Regular microbial testing is vital for this purpose. Investigating the specific mechanisms through which FBPI influences microbial growth could offer valuable insights into how plant proteins might be used for food preservation. Further studies could examine the relationship between protein concentration, microbial flora, and preservation efficacy. While refrigeration typically slows microbial growth, the rise in SPC suggests that microbial activity persists, emphasizing the need for additional preservation strategies beyond refrigeration alone. The results highlight the importance of not relying solely on refrigeration for food safety, as it cannot prevent spoilage indefinitely. The findings suggest that formulating meat products with varying levels of FBPI requires a balance between nutritional enhancement and preservation effectiveness. To achieve optimal microbial control, manufacturers may need to consider integrating other additives or processes, such as acidification or the use of natural preservatives, alongside FBPI. The increasing SPC emphasizes the need for both consumers and manufacturers to follow safety guidelines and regularly conduct microbial assessments. This is especially crucial for meat products, where spoilage can pose significant health risks.
Figure 5. Changes of Standard plate count (SPC) cfu/g of burgers with different levels of Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) over 30 days of refrigerated storage. FBPI Levels: B1 - Control; B2 - 10% FBPI; B3 - 15% FBPI; B4 - 20% FBPI. Significance: values indicated by histograms with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Mean ± Standard Deviation: Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).
Figure 6 presents an evaluation of sensory characteristics—including color, flavor, texture, taste, juiciness, and overall acceptability—in burgers prepared with different levels of faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) and stored for 30 days under refrigerated conditions. The response surface model demonstrated good reliability and significance, as indicated by the underlying data. The samples analyzed include B1 (Control, 0% FBPI), B2 (10% FBPI), B3 (15% FBPI), and B4 (20% FBPI). Initially, color ratings were highest in the 20% FBPI sample (B4 at 8.2), but declined over the 30-day period across all samples. However, those with higher FBPI levels (B3 and B4) maintained color more effectively than the control (B1). By the end of the storage period, color was significantly reduced in all samples, particularly in those with lower FBPI levels. Studies indicate that plant-based proteins, like faba bean protein isolate (FBPI), can influence color stability in meat analogs and blends. The light-colored proteins in faba beans may help preserve or even improve the visual appeal of foods, partly due to their ability to reduce oxidative discoloration in refrigerated products. Research also suggests that increasing protein content can modulate the Maillard reaction during cooking, contributing to desirable browning in cooked products. The impact of FBPI on flavor is multifaceted. Some studies highlight that faba bean proteins contain flavor-active compounds that may either enhance or mask specific flavors in meat products. Additionally, incorporating FBPI has been shown to positively influence flavor retention during storage by limiting lipid oxidation, a primary cause of flavor deterioration in refrigerated meats. The addition of faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) can significantly alter the textural properties of meat products, primarily through its high water-holding capacity. This characteristic helps reduce moisture loss and enhances the mouthfeel of refrigerated products over time. Previous research has also suggested that FBPI’s ability to retain water plays a key role in maintaining a firmer texture, which is particularly advantageous for products stored under chilled conditions. Faba bean proteins have been shown to enhance taste by contributing to a desirable umami profile, often sought after in meat analogs. The water-binding properties of FBPI can also improve juiciness by reducing moisture loss during storage, as observed in studies of plant protein-meat blends. Additionally, studies support the notion that moderate to high FBPI levels enhance flavor retention due to better moisture retention capacity, which is directly linked to a fuller taste perception. Several studies also highlight that blending animal proteins with plant proteins, like FBPI, can improve overall acceptability by combining the desirable attributes of both protein sources. FBPI, in particular, has demonstrated potential in maintaining overall sensory acceptability, leading to better stability in flavor, texture, and color over time.
Figure 6. The response surface plot of sensory characteristics of burgers with different levels of Faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) during 20-day refrigerated storage on the (A) taste, (B) odor, and (C) overall acceptability.
Plant proteins like faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) are known to influence aroma profiles due to their unique amino acid composition, which interacts with other ingredients during cooking and storage. Research indicates that FBPI, in particular, can neutralize off-odors in refrigerated products, possibly due to its lower sulfur content compared to other plant proteins, which are often associated with undesirable aromas. Additionally, the aroma retention over time may be linked to the low lipid content in FBPI, which helps reduce oxidative rancidity, a common cause of off-odors during storage. This characteristic of FBPI could contribute to better overall sensory appeal, particularly in plant-based and hybrid meat products.
pH stability is essential in meat products because fluctuations can affect microbial growth and texture. Studies have shown that incorporating faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) into meat products can help stabilize pH, maintaining product safety and quality during refrigerated storage. The buffering capacity of FBPI further enhances this stability, improving microbial resistance and extending shelf life, especially in products like burgers. Additionally, plant proteins, including FBPI, are known to reduce protein and lipid oxidation due to their antioxidant compounds, such as polyphenols and flavonoids, naturally present in legumes. FBPI has been shown to significantly reduce lipid oxidation in meat blends, helping to limit flavor degradation and maintain longer-lasting sensory qualities, particularly in refrigerated conditions. FBPI’s water-holding and gel-forming properties contribute to reduced cooking loss and shrinkage in meat products, improving yield. Studies indicate that these properties help bind moisture and fat, leading to juicier, more visually appealing products post-cooking. This effect is especially beneficial during storage, as higher cooking yields mean that burgers retain their original weight and size more effectively, even after extended refrigeration. Beyond its impact on sensory quality, FBPI’s nutritional profile enriches products with higher protein content and essential amino acids, appealing to health-conscious consumers. Faba beans are a rich source of lysine, an amino acid that complements the protein profile of meats and other ingredients in burger formulations. Research suggests that these added nutritional benefits can enhance consumer acceptability, as health considerations increasingly influence purchasing decisions in the market.
Research indicates that faba bean protein isolate (FBPI)’s gel-forming and water-binding abilities improve texture and moisture retention, leading to a juicier, firmer mouthfeel in meat analogues. These properties help mitigate moisture loss during cooking and storage, which in turn helps maintain a more desirable bite in plant-based meat products. FBPI’s gelation properties are particularly effective in applications that require a textured meat analogue, as they mimic the firmness and succulence of animal-based proteins. Studies also emphasize FBPI’s role in enhancing emulsion stability, ensuring the even distribution of fats and proteins in meat mixtures. Furthermore, FBPI can reduce the bitter or beany notes typically associated with plant proteins, thus improving consumer acceptability. The protein’s ability to balance flavors is attributed to its lower levels of sulfur-containing amino acids, which can reduce the earthy or metallic tastes often found in some legumes. This flavor masking ability makes FBPI especially valuable in meat products, where subtle taste differences are critical. In addition, FBPI’s smooth texture enhances mouthfeel, which is particularly advantageous in emulsion-based products like patties and sausages. The protein naturally contains antioxidants, such as polyphenols and flavonoids, which combat lipid and protein oxidation. This is crucial for preventing rancidity and maintaining freshness over time. Studies have shown that these antioxidant compounds help preserve the sensory qualities and nutritional profile of meat products during extended refrigerated storage. Specifically, FBPI has been linked to lower levels of lipid peroxides and carbonyl compounds—markers of oxidative deterioration. Incorporating FBPI also significantly boosts the protein content and overall nutritional profile of meat analogues, catering to the growing demand for high-protein plant-based foods. Faba beans, the source of FBPI, are particularly rich in lysine, an essential amino acid that is often limited in other plant proteins. This makes FBPI an effective complement to other ingredients in plant-based products. A 2022 study highlighted that consumers are increasingly seeking products with higher lysine levels due to the amino acid’s importance in immune function and protein synthesis. This nutritional enhancement adds functional appeal to consumers, especially those seeking plant-based options without compromising protein quality.
FBPI has demonstrated resilience across a range of processing methods, including extrusion, high-pressure processing, and blending, making it a reliable ingredient in meat production. Research indicates that FBPI retains its functional properties, including solubility and emulsion stability, even under intense processing conditions, making it suitable for different formats of meat and meat analogues. This adaptability is vital for large-scale commercial applications, where maintaining consistent quality across various product types is crucial. Flavor scores were initially similar across all samples but declined gradually over time, with B2 and B3 outperforming the control (B1) in flavor retention. These results suggest that moderate levels of FBPI may enhance the flavor stability of refrigerated burgers. The B4 sample, which contained the highest amount of FBPI, began with a texture score of 8.6 and consistently maintained a higher rating compared to the control and lower FBPI samples throughout the storage period. This indicates that a higher FBPI content may improve texture stability in refrigerated burgers. Both attributes followed similar trends, with slight declines over time. Samples B3 and B4, with 15% and 20% FBPI, respectively, generally exhibited higher scores than the control, indicating that incorporating FBPI can improve taste and juiciness retention. Although all samples showed a minor decline in overall acceptability scores over 30 days, those with moderate to high FBPI (B3 and B4) maintained better acceptability than the control. This suggests that FBPI not only stabilizes sensory attributes but also enhance the appeal of burgers during refrigerated storage. Faba bean protein has strong water- and fat-binding abilities that improve texture, moisture content, and overall mouthfeel in meat analogues. A 2023 study highlighted that FBPI’s water-holding capacity increased firmness and cohesiveness in meat substitute products, mimicking the mouthfeel of traditional meat. Research also found that FBPI’s emulsifying properties stabilize fat and water interactions in mixed products, which is particularly beneficial in meat applications where texture and juiciness are critical. One challenge with plant proteins in meat analogues is the strong “beany” flavor, which can negatively impact consumer acceptance. Research shows that FBPI has a relatively neutral flavor profile compared to other legume proteins, making it a preferable option for applications where taste is a priority. Recent sensory evaluations have demonstrated that FBPI’s flavor profile helps reduce off-flavors, enhancing the acceptability of meat analogues. FBPI’s high lysine content provides a more balanced amino acid profile, enhancing the nutritional quality of meat analogues that might otherwise be deficient in this essential amino acid. A 2021 nutritional study reported that consumers seeking high-protein, plant-based foods benefit from FBPI’s lysine-rich profile, making it suitable for creating nutrient-dense food products. This functional enhancement is crucial for plant-based products that closely match or exceed the nutritional qualities of animal protein sources. FBPI also maintains its functional properties under high-heat processing, such as extrusion, commonly used in the production of textured vegetable proteins. Studies confirm that FBPI’s solubility and gelation properties remain stable even under intense heat, ensuring consistent quality in commercial meat analogue applications. This thermal resilience is essential in meat analogion, where varied processing conditions are employed to achieve different textures and product forms.
Recent studies have emphasized the potential health benefits of consuming faba bean proteins, which are abundant in dietary fiber, vitamins, and bioactive compounds such as polyphenols. Research indicates that diets incorporating faba bean protein can promote cardiovascular health, aid digestion, and possibly lower the risk of chronic diseases due to its anti-inflammatory properties.
Range of True and Predicted Values:
True (observed): 6.5 – 8.5
Predicted: 6.7 – 8.3
RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error): 0.35 (Lower RMSE indicates a good fit of the model)
R2: 0.92 (Indicates that 92% of the variation in taste scores can be explained by the model)
F-value: 25.6 (The higher the F-value, the more significant the model)
p-value: 0.03 (Since it’s less than 0.05, the model is statistically significant).
This study underscores the considerable potential of faba bean protein isolate (FBPI) as a sustainable and functional ingredient for improving the quality and nutritional profile of meat analogues. FBPI enhances texture, water-binding capacity, and flavor neutrality, all of which are essential for consumer acceptance. Moreover, its high lysine content and natural antioxidant properties contribute to the nutritional value and shelf life of meat products, supporting the development of cleaner-label, high-protein plant-based foods. These findings align with the increasing demand for plant-based alternatives that closely resemble traditional meat characteristics while maintaining high quality and nutrition.
Future research could focus on optimizing the functional properties of FBPI through advanced processing techniques, such as enzymatic modification and fermentation, to enhance its performance in food applications. Additionally, exploring blends of plant proteins, including combinations of FBPI with other legume or cereal proteins, may yield formulations with complementary nutritional and functional benefits. It would also be valuable to assess consumer responses across different demographic groups and identify any potential allergens in faba bean protein to support broader market adoption. Finally, investigating FBPI’s applications beyond meat analogues, such as in dairy alternatives and snack foods, could expand its role in plant-based food innovation. These efforts will help unlock FBPI’s full potential in addressing both consumer and industry demands.
The authors extend their appreciation to Taif University, Saudi Arabia for supporting this work through project number (TU-DSPP-2024-238).
The author declares no conflicts of interest related to this research.
This research was funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia, Project No. (TU-DSPP-2024-238)
Data will be made available on request.
American Public Health Association (APHA) (2013). Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods (5th ed). American Public Health Association.
AMSA. (2012). Meat Color Measurement Guidelines. American Meat Science Association.
AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (18th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Baldwin, A., et al. (2020). Role of Plant Proteins in Food Matrix Stability. Journal of Food Science, 85(8), 2345–2353.
Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1), 1–42. 10.2307/3001478
Fang, Z., et al. (2019). Quality Retention in Meat Analogs with Protein Additives. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 22, 100416. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100416
Huang, Q., et al. (2022). Role of Plant-Based Additives in Enhancing Food Color Stability. Food Research International, 151, 110924.
Huang, W., et al. (2019). Malondialdehyde (MDA) content in meats: Measurement and implications for oxidative stress and shelf life. Food Science and Technology, 39(4), 602–611.
Hughes, E., Cofrades, S., & Troy, D. J. (1997). Effects of fat level, oat fibre and carrageenan on frankfurters formulated with 5% and 12% fat. Meat Science, 45(3), 273–281. 10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00109-X
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 4833-1:2013, Microbiology of the food chain–Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms–Part 1: Colony count at 30°C by the pour plate technique. International Organization for Standardization.
Jang, A., and Bae, Y. S. (2020). Effect of plant-based protein isolates on the quality characteristics of emulsion-type meat products. Food Science and Biotechnology, 29(4), 551–560.
Mancini, R. A., & Hunt, M. C. (2005). Current research in meat color. Meat Science, 71(1), 100–121. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.003
Mancini, R. A., & Hunt, M. C. (2005). The Science of Meat and Meat Products (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
Martínez, L., et al. (2017). The effect of antioxidants on color stability and oxidative stability in meat products. Food Research International, 99, 11–20.
Martínez, M., Marín, L., & Villén, J. (2017). Proteins from legumes as functional ingredients in meat products. Food Chemistry, 234, 146–155.
Oliver, C. N., Ahn, B. W., Moerman, E. J., Goldstein, S., & Stadtman, E. R. (1987). Age-related changes in oxidized proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 262(12), 5488–5491. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45598-6
Rios, R. V., et al. (2019). Plant Proteins as Color Stabilizers in Meat Analog Products. Journal of Food Quality, 42(4), 815–826.
Savadkoohi, S., et al. (2014). Effects of Faba Bean Protein on Meat Products. Meat Science, 98(4), 759–765. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.024
Shand, P. J., Ya, H. E., and Gill, T. A. (2009). Textural, microstructural, and functional properties of pork batter containing faba bean protein isolate. Meat Science, 82(3), 494–501.
Steel, R.G.D., & Torrie, J.H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Tarladgis, B. G., Watts, B. M., & Younathan, M. T. (1960). A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 37(1), 44–48. 10.1007/BF02630824
Xiong, Y. L. (2018). Antioxidative peptides derived from muscle and food proteins and their potential applications in the food industry. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 53(3), 828–839.
Xiong, Y. L. (2018). Textural properties of meat and meat products. In: Meat Science: An Introductory Text. CRC Press.
Yousefi, S., and Jafari, S. M. (2022). Application of plant proteins in functional and structural stability of meat products. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 46(7), e16882.
Youssef, M. K., & Barbut, S. (2011). Effects of protein isolate level and fat on microstructure, color, and sensory properties of meat batters. Meat Science, 87(1), 21–28. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.09.002
Zhang, C., et al. (2021). Influence of Protein Isolates on Textural Properties. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 69, 102641. 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102641