1Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Jerash University, Jerash, Jordan;
2Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Al-Arab St. 21, Amman, 11931, Jordan;
3QU Health, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar;
4Department of Animal Production and Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Jerash University, Jerash, Jordan;
5Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Palestine Technical University-Kadoorie (PTUK), Tulkarm, Palestine;
6Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan;
7Department of Food Science & Nutrition, College of Life Sciences, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait;
8Department of Food Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada;
9Food Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia;
10Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Bab-Al-Mouadam, Iraq;
11Department of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Whey proteins (WPs) are the most widely used protein supplements worldwide. This study investigates the impact of incorporating trehalose into WPs at different ratios ranging from 1% to 5% (w/v) on the structural characteristics, surface properties, and functionality of trehalose (T) conjugated to WPs (T-WP). The T-WP conjugate was produced using the pH-shifting technique. Our findings demonstrated that conjugating trehalose into WPs significantly altered the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum, tertiary structure, and protein conformation. The surface charge and hydrophobicity of T-WPs were changed significantly (p < 0.05). Structural modifications had a notable effect on the solubility and digestibility of T-WPs. The water solubility of T-WPs increased from 88.12% to 95.53% when conjugated with 5% (w/v) trehalose. Furthermore, the impact of the development of T-WPs on FTIR spectrum was investigated. The β-sheet, random coil, α-helix, and β-turn were changed significantly from 36.17% to 45.21%, 12.38% to 16.39%, 10.69% to 13.44%, and 40.76% to 24.94%, respectively. The results presented in this study offer structural information to enhance the creation of WP products with improved functional properties.
Key words: disaccharide, tertiary structure, water solubility, whey proteins
*Corresponding Author: Mohammad Alrosan, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Jerash University, Jerash, Jordan. Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Received: 3 December 2023; Accepted: 23 June 2024; Published: 14 August 2024
© 2024 Codon Publications
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
The increasing demand for whey proteins (WPs) among bodybuilders has prompted the development of new dry formulations of protein supplements. These formulations include protectants to preserve functional properties during storage (Alrosan et al., 2023). WPs have high-quality protein derived from milk during the production of cheese (Bondoc, 2007; Bondoc and Șindilar, 2002). The most functional property of proteins is water solubility; other functional properties depend on their water solubility (Alrosan et al., 2022). The water solubility of WPs is approximately 89.4% (Alrosan et al., 2023), which is considered to have excellent water solubility, compared to other proteins, such as casein (~84%), lentil (~58%), and quinoa (~76%) (Alrosan et al., 2024a, 2024b; Wang et al., 2023). Water solubility and digestibility are important considerations for bodybuilders because the digestibility of a protein is a crucial factor in determining its quality. Protein quality is a measure of a protein that can be digested, absorbed, and used by the body for various functions, particularly for tissue growth and repair (Adhikari et al., 2022; Bondoc, 2007).
The digestibility of WPs is ~88.4% (Alrosan et al., 2023). Numerous studies have reported that pH shifting is a technique used to modify protein structure by altering the pH of the surrounding alkaline environment (Jiang et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2023; Alrosan et al., 2022). The pH-shifting method is a technique used to alter the pH environment of proteins to induce changes in their structure, solubility, and functionality (Alrosan et al., 2022; Figueroa-González et al., 2022; Jiang et al., 2022). The pH shifting method can cause proteins to unfold in an alkaline environment and refold the conformation protein (Alrosan et al., 2024a). This property is applied to expose reactive sites on protein for conjugation with other molecules, including disaccharides (Alrosan et al., 2024a; Chen et al., 2019; Cui et al., 2023) and polysaccharides (Yang et al., 2020; Yildiz et al., 2018). It was discovered by Yildiz et al. (2018) that processing plant protein with pH-shifting could enhance water solubility, surface hydrophobicity, and emulsion properties if combined with polysaccharides. Moreover, the interaction between proteins and disaccharides is extensively studied concerning their effect on the surface characteristics of proteins. A recent study conducted by Alrosan et al. (2024a) discovered that trehalose interacts with the surface of protein molecules, altering their hydration shell and reducing intermolecular interactions that lead to aggregation. This interaction prevents proteins from forming insoluble aggregates, thereby increasing their solubility. On the other hand, noncovalent bonds play a crucial role in modifying the conformation of proteins (Dai et al., 2022). These interactions are essential for maintaining protein structure and functionality (Alrosan et al., 2024a; Hao et al., 2022; Ke et al., 2023). Hydrogen bonds are crucial to form secondary structures, such as α-helices and β-sheets. In α-helices, hydrogen bonds are formed between the carbonyl oxygen of one amino acid and the amide hydrogen of other amino acids. In β-sheets, hydrogen bonds are formed between carbonyl and amide groups of adjacent strands (Tan et al., 2021). The main objective of this research is to find an innovative method that combines WPs with trehalose based on pH-shifting to prepare a composite of trehalose-conjugated WPs (T-WP) with high solubility and digestibility. In addition, this study also evaluates the properties of the surface, particle size, and protein structures, including secondary and tertiary structures.
Whey protein (protein: ~83.4%, fat: ~4.6%, moisture: ~8%, and ash: ~4%) was obtained from Now Food (IL, USA), while trehalose with a molecular weight of 378.33 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (CA, USA). All additional chemicals or materials utilized in this research were of reagent grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Trehalose solution was produced at different concentrations (0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% w/v) in a solution buffered with phosphate. A magnetic stirrer (Toanlab, SH-4, Arizona, USA) agitated trehalose solutions of different concentrations for 2 h at room temperature (21°C). T-WPs were produced using the pH-shifting method at a pH of 12. This method involved combining 1 g of WP with various concentrations of trehalose (Alrosan et al., 2024a). The samples were labeled as 0T-WP (control), 1T-WP, 2T-WP, 3T-WP, and 5T-WP, indicating different concentrations (1–5%, w/w) of trehalose.
The water solubility of T-WPs was measured based on the procedure used by Alrosan et al. (2024a) and Wang et al. (2019) with slight modifications. In brief, 200 mg of sample and 18 g of distilled water were dissolved in a 50-mL glass beaker. Following that, the pH values of suspensions were adjusted to pH 7.0 using 0.2-M NaOH and again stirred for 60 min. After 10 min of rest, the suspensions were adjusted to 1% (w/v). The water solubility percentage of the sample was determined using Equation (1). Soluble nitrogen in whole sample (NW), supernatant (NS), and blank sample (NB) was determined based on the Kjeldahl method (AOAC Method 930.29) (AOAC, 2012):
The FTIR analysis was conducted using an FTIR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, IRAffinity-1S, Kyoto, Japan). The FTIR spectrum was analyzed between 400 cm-1 and 4000 cm-1 based on the procedure followed by Alrosan et al. (2023). The FTIR analysis provided valuable insights into the molecular structure and composition of samples by measuring the absorption of infrared light at various wavelengths based on the procedure described by Alrosan et al. (2023).
The surface charge (ζ) of the samples was determined using the method described by Alrosan et al. (2023). In brief, the sample was dissolved in distilled water at a final ratio of 1 mg/mL. The pH was adjusted to 7.0, and the solution was analyzed using the zetasizer particle size analyzer (Malvern Panalytical, Nano-ZS, Malvern, UK). The particle size of the sample was studied using the Zetasizer Nano-ZS based on the procedure adopted by Wang et al. (2023). Prior to the scans, the samples were dissolved in distilled water for a final concentration of 0.01% and pH 7.0.
1-Anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate (ANS) was used to measure the surface hydrophobicity of T-WPs using a fluorescence spectrometer (Agilent, Cary Eclipse, Santa Clara, USA) based on the procedure mentioned by Alrosan et al. (2024b) Phosphate-buffered solutions with a pH of 7.0 were used to dissolve samples to produce diluted samples. The concentration of samples ranged from 0.01% to 0.1%. ANS (20 μL, 8 mM) was added to each sample (4 mL). The emission and excitation wavelengths were measured within a range of 470–390 nm, with slits of 1 nm width. The surface hydrophobicity of WPs and T-WPs was evaluated by determining the gradient of graphs showing the correlation between relative fluorescence intensity and protein quantity.
The tertiary protein structure of T-WPs was evaluated using the Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer with emission and excitation at a respective wavelength of 300–450 nm and 280 nm. The samples were diluted to a concentration of 0.001% (w/v) at pH 7.0.
The conformation of T-WPs was caused using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV-3600, Kyoto, Japan) with a UV-spectrum of 190–350 nm, and the peak was observed at approximately 280 nm, indicating the presence of tryptophan. The samples were evaluated at a concentration of 0.01 mg/mL at pH 7.0.
Molecular forces governing protein interactions were investigated using the Santa Clara Fluorescence spectrometer with an emission of 300–450 nm and an excitation of 280 nm. Before scanning, the sample was treated with 10-mM NaCl, thiourea, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to evaluate various contributing forces of interaction, such as electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic interaction. The samples were diluted to a concentration of 0.001% (w/v) and at pH 7.0.
The digestibility of T-WPs was evaluated according to the procedure described by Alrosan et al. (2023). Samples (250 mg) were mixed in pepsin solution (1.5 mg/mL) and the suspension was dispersed in 15-mL 0.1-M HCl solution containing 1-mL 0.005-M sodium azide. The suspension was placed in a water bath (Memmert, WB22, Schwabach, Germany) at 37°C for 3 h. Subsequently, a solution containing 7.5 mL of 0.5-M NaOH and 10 mg of pancreatin was added to the suspension and placed in a water bath at 37°C for 24 h. Throughout the incubation period, the mixtures were centrifugated (CN Meditech, CNME060222, Nanjing, China) at 10,000 ×g for 20 min. Equation (1) was used to determine the protein digestibility of WPs and T-WPs.
A differential scanning calorimeter (Mettler-Toledo, DSC 3, Greifensee, Switzerland) was used to measure denaturation temperature (Td) of T-WPs according to the procedure described by Alrosan et al. (2024a). A 5-mg sample was placed on aluminum crucible pots. Nitrogen gas was used as a carrier with a 100-mL/min flow rate. The temperature range was set at -70 to 150°C, with a heating rate of 20°C/min. The DSC software was employed to determine the Td of T-WPs based on the thermograms.
The statistical analysis of the study was performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM, Chicago, US).
Soluble T-WPs were generated using the pH-shifting method. The effect of pH on the solubility of T-WPs is shown in Figure 1A. The highest level of solubility was observed as ~95.5%, higher than the percentage of WPs, which was ~88%. Our observation about the solubility of WPs was according to a computed result of Alrosan et al. (2023). There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the influence of pH on the conjugates of 1T-WP, 2T-WP, and 3T-WP. Meanwhile, the trehalose ratio significantly influences (p < 0.05) the water solubility of T-WPs. Figure 1A illustrates a significant rise (p < 0.05) in the solubility of 5T-WP, approximately 95.5%, compared to the control (0T-WP). This substantial increase suggests that trehalose conjugation markedly improves the solubility of WPs, potentially enhancing their functional properties for various applications. It was reported by Yildiz et al. (2018) that soy protein isolate’s water solubility was affected by pH shifting after it was conjugated with polysaccharides because of the factors related to protein and polysaccharide interactions, protein’s isoelectric point, and the structural changes that occurred during the formation of T-WPs.
Figure 1. Changes in (A) average water solubility, (B) protein digestibility, (C) fluorescence intensity, and (D) UV absorbance of trehalose-whey protein conjugates (T-WPs). Control (0T-WP) represents the absence of trehalose, while 1T-WP, 2T-WP, 3T-WP, and 5T-WP represent trehalose conjugation with WPs at 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% (w/v) concentration of trehalose, respectively. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
The digestibility of T-WPs significantly increased (p < 0.05) from 88.16% to 94.89% after the conjugation of trehalose with WPs during the pH-shifting process (Figure 1B). The increased concentration of trehalose ameliorated the digestibility of T-WPs. This increase was due to the formation of whey protein–trehalose complexes, increasing protein solubility. This allowed enzymes (e.g., pepsin and protease) to have easier access to active sites on proteins for digestion (Alrosan et al., 2024b; Liu et al., 2023), compared to intact WPs, which had less surface area or sites for the enzymes to bind and breakdown of proteins (Nourmohammadi et al., 2024).
The surface polarity and microdomain environment of T-WPs could additionally affect their protein digestibility. An investigation of intrinsic fluorescence and surface hydrophobicity was conducted (Figure 1C). The T-WP’s emission spectrum peaked at 335 nm approximately, suggesting that the tryptophan residues were partially visible on the protein surface (Alrosan et al., 2024a; Nourmohammadi et al., 2024). The pre-digestibility of T-WPs resulted in notable alterations in the protein’s absorption characteristics and the wavelength at which the highest intensity took place. These changes provided insights into the micro-environment surrounding tryptophan residues. The fluorescence intensity of T-WPs was compared to the control. Furthermore, additional research documented similar results to WPs (Alrosan et al., 2024a; Nourmohammadi et al., 2024) Recently, studies conducted by Alrosan et al. (2024b) and Nourmohammadi et al. (2024) reported that certain buried tryptophan residues had a modest quantum yield but could boost fluorescence intensity by more than 10-fold. Pre-digestibility of T-WPs could potentially cause the unfolding of protein and reveal previously hidden tryptophan residues (Alrosan et al., 2023). The presence of trehalose caused a decrease in the fluorescence intensity of T-WPs, which was dependent on trehalose concentration in T-WPs. It could improve the local electrostatic area, leading to interactions between the side chain group and the excited indole rings of tryptophan residues, consequently decreasing the fluorescence intensity of proteins.
The surface hydrophobicity of T-WPs decreased dramatically following hydrolysis, regardless of trehalose concentration (Figure 1D), implying increased polarity of T-WPs. The surface hydrophobicity of T-WPs declined significantly (p < 0.05) by two-fold, 420 arbitrary units approximately, compared to that of the control of 204 a.u. approximately. Our results were similar to the findings reported by Alrosan et al. (2024a), Liu et al. (2023), and Nourmohammadi et al. (2024). The generated peptides also formed aggregates through hydrophobic interactions, which occurred if the solvent was exposed and increased hydrophilic groups (Chen and Campanella, 2022). It is essential to mention that intrinsic fluorescence and surface hydrophobicity were investigated in the trehalose range of 1–5%. Several studies discovered that coating specific hydrophobic regions with trehalose decreased the surface hydrophobicity of proteins (Liu et al., 2024; Yue et al., 2021). In the present study, this phenomenon could have happened, and the process of pre-digestibility revealed some internal areas of WPs, thereby enabling trehalose to attach through hydrophobic interactions.
The influence of conjugating disaccharides, specifically trehalose, on the structure of WPs was investigated using FTIR (Figure 2A). Peaks at 1236 cm-1 and 1535.3 cm-1 in the FTIR spectrum were observed to change positions, indicating the influence of trehalose in the pH-shifting technique (Jiang et al., 2022). In addition, the peak at 3300.2 cm-1 experienced a shift, which was attributed to the vibrational stretching of the hydroxyl group. Furthermore, the stretching vibrations of C–O and C–C bonds were affected by a moved peak at 1031 cm-1. The observed absorption peaks provided precise information for carbohydrates. These are organic molecules consisting of oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon. The presence of peaks at 3300 cm-1 and 3388 cm-1 suggested that trehalose was associated with WPs, as evidenced by the shift to 3308 cm-1 and the quantity of trehalose in the conjugated state.
Figure 2. Changes in (A) FTIR absorbance, (B) fluorescence intensity (molecular forces), (C) surface charge, (D) surface hydrophobicity, and (E) particle size of trehalose–whey protein conjugates (T-WPs). Control (0T-WP) represents the absence of trehalose, while 1T-WP, 2T-WP, 3T-WP, and 5T-WP represent trehalose conjugation with WPs at 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% (w/v) concentration of trehalose, respectively. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
The secondary protein structure components of T-WPs exhibited a substantial difference (p < 0.05) (Table 1). The protein’s secondary structure was analyzed by examining the FTIR spectrum of amide II in a range of 1600–1699 cm-1 (Table 1). This analysis aimed to understand the conformational changes that occurred in case WPs interacted with trehalose. The secondary structure components, such as β-sheet, random coil, and α-helix, increased significantly (p < 0.05) from 36.16% to 45.21%, 12.38% to 16.39%, and 10.69% to 13.44%, respectively. The most crucial β-sheet conformation was frequently located within the hydrophobic interior of proteins, thus decreasing protein solubility. On the other hand, the percentage of random coil typically exposed more hydrophilic and polar residues to the solvent, enhancing water solubility. Previous investigation showed that alterations in the secondary protein structure were the result of changes in molecular forces, which included electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions (Alrosan et al., 2022, 2024a; Ducel et al., 2008; Soltanizadeh et al., 2014). The percentage of β-turn decreased significantly (p < 0.05) from 40.76% to 24.95%. The findings suggested that trehalose had a critical role in modifying the secondary structure of proteins. Specifically, the conjugation of trehalose with WPs affected the proportion of α-helices and random coils, influencing the protein’s functional properties, such as solubility and digestibility.
Table 1. The proportion of secondary protein components detected in complex protein structures derived from trehalose-whey protein conjugates at different concentrations of trehalose (0–5% w/w).
Secondary protein components | Trehalose–whey protein conjugates (T-WPs) | p value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0T-WP | 1T-WP | 2T-WP | 3T-WP | 5T-WP | ||
β-sheet (Σ) | 36.17d | 38.15c | 39.11c | 42.78b | 45.21a | <0.05 |
Random Coil (Σ) | 12.38c | 13.68b | 13.94b | 16.00a | 16.39a | <0.05 |
α-Helix (Σ) | 10.69e | 11.82d | 12.12c | 13.15b | 13.44a | <0.05 |
β-turn (Σ) | 40.76a | 36.33b | 34.81c | 28.05d | 24.94e | <0.05 |
Td | 82.5d | 84.5c | 85.5b | 86.1b | 87.0a | <0.05 |
Mean values (n = 3) with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05). Control (0T-whey protein [WP]) represents the absence of trehalose conjugation with WPs. Meanwhile, 1T-WP, 2T-WP, 3T-WP, and 5T-WP represent WPs conjugated with trehalose at 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% (w/w), respectively. Td: denaturation temperature.
Ultraviolet spectroscopy is a powerful tool for analyzing protein conformations because the absorption characteristics of proteins in the UV region were susceptible to their secondary and tertiary structures (Alrosan et al., 2022). Aromatic amino acids, that is, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan, had a crucial role in the UV absorption characteristics of proteins and showed distinct absorption properties at 280 nm approximately. The interaction between trehalose and WPs decreased absorbance at 230 nm (A230), as shown in Figure 2B. This increase indicated protein refolding processes. Changes in pH could lead to the protonation or deprotonation of amino acid side chains, particularly those with ionizable groups, disrupting existing interactions and promoting new ones, driving conformational changes because of conjugated trehalose with WPs. It was evident that conjugation did not occur because of WP coating on the trehalose surface. Instead, it happened because of synergistic structural interactions between WPs and trehalose (Alrosan et al., 2024a). These results intended that the structures of WPs and trehalose probably interacted through the interaction of peptide chains or secondary structures, rather than higher structures, that is, tertiary structures.
The role of noncovalent bonding in the molecular binding of T-WPs and the emission spectrum demonstrated molecular forces within or between T-WPs. Remarkably, the presence of each foreign component improved the Fmax of the emission spectrum (<340 nm) by 10 mM. NaCl, thiourea, and SDS affected electrostatic, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions. In Figure 2C, electrostatic interactions showed a higher peak than hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, suggesting that electrostatic interactions contributed more to the formation of conjugates between trehalose and WPs than hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions.
ζ-potential measures the particle’s overall charge in a particular medium of T-WPs. It reflects the net surface charge influenced by the ionizable groups present and increases water solubility (Asen and Aluko, 2022). The 5T-WP shows a significantly higher (p < 0.05) surface charge level of approximately -34 mV, compared to that of the control of approximately -40.8 mV (Figure 2D). This indicates that ζ-potential regulates the electrostatic stability of protein solutions. Various studies have reported that higher absolute values suggest greater repulsion between protein molecules, leading to increased solubility (Gao et al., 2020; Alrosan et al., 2024a). Cui et al. (2021) reported that the surface charge of pea proteins is increased after their conjugation with disaccharides, specifically sucrose and trehalose. A substantial electrostatic repulsion is anticipated between the molecules, thereby preventing their aggregation. Overall, manipulating surface charge through conjugation with disaccharides can significantly impact the electrostatic stability of protein solutions. This finding has important implications for enhancing solubility and preventing aggregation in various applications of protein-based products.
The thermal stability of T-WPs was determined by measuring their denaturation temperature (Td) as shown in Table 1. Our findings revealed a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the thermal stability of WPs, increasing the concentration of T-WPs. The highest thermal stability of T-WPs is 87ºC approximately, while the control has a lower thermal stability of 82.5ºC approximately. Trehalose prevents denaturation, which increases the structural resistance of WPs. This impediment is significant under stress conditions, such as pH changes or thermal treatment. In addition, trehalose improved the solubility and digestibility of WPs with combined pH-shifting techniques, which further modulate the protein’s surface charge and structure.
Trehalose-conjugated whey proteins are formed by many noncovalent interactions, which play a vital role in enhancing their activity. The interactions observed in this study encompass quantified hydrogen bonds, electrostatic interactions, and hydrophobic interactions. In a study conducted by Alrosan et al. (2024a), molecular forces, such as hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interaction, and hydrophobic interaction, might enhance the thermal stability of structured protein. Understanding these molecular forces can provide valuable insights for optimizing protein-based formulations in various applications.
Particle size determines the degree of protein breakdown (Sun et al., 2023). The particle size of T-WPs with varied proportions of trehalose during conjugation based on the pH-shifting process is shown in Figure 2E. The conjugation of trehalose increased the higher concentration of trehalose reacted with WPs. Furthermore, the diameter of particles in digestive products grew gradually during gastrointestinal digestion (Huang et al., 2024), suggesting that greater quantities of trehalose conjugating during pH shifting can enhance the digestion of proteins in WPs, which aligns with the observed digestion rate. In addition, a notable difference (p < 0.05) in the particle size of T-WPs was observed compared to the control. Previous studies indicated that the particle sizes of complex compounds increased due to interactions between disaccharides or polysaccharides and proteins (Alrosan et al., 2024a; Wang et al., 2023), as disaccharides formed hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions with protein molecules (Alrosan et al., 2024a). These interactions could lead to the aggregation of protein molecules, resulting in the formation of larger particles. Moreover, polysaccharides have multiple binding sites that interact with proteins (Liu et al., 2023), leading to cross-linking, where a single polysaccharide molecule binds to multiple protein molecules, thereby increasing the overall size of the complex. Proteins and polysaccharides often carry charges on their surfaces (Xue and Luo, 2023). Electrostatic attractions between oppositely charged regions lead to the formation of larger aggregates (Alrosan et al., 2024a).
This study investigated the effect of different trehalose (as conjugates) concentrations combined with WPs on secondary protein structure, protein conformation, tertiary structure, particle size, surface charge, and surface hydrophobicity. The results demonstrated that water solubility and digestibility of WPs improved by adding trehalose in the pH-shifting process. On the other hand, noncovalent bonds synthesized trehalose conjugates with WPs in the pH-shifting process. The ratio of trehalose in T-WPs exhibited significant variations in changing WP structure and surface properties. Furthermore, the study found that incorporating trehalose into WPs resulted in protein conformation and changes in tertiary structure. These alterations could improve water solubility and digestibility.
The authors stated that they had no conflict of interest.
Data are available on request.
This study was financially supported by King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (project No. RSP2024R502). The authors acknowledged and appreciated Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) and Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) for granting permission to use their facilities.
Mohammad Alrosan: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Formal analysis, Resources, Software, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, and Data curation. Motasem Al-Massad: Software, Writing – review & editing. Ali Al-Qaisi: Investigation, Writing – original draft. Sana Gammoh: Project administration, Writing – review & editing. Muhammad H. Alu’datt: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Farah R. Al Qudsi: Investigation, Writing – original draft. Thuan-Chew Tan: Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Ammar A. Razzak Mahmood: Writing – review & editing. Ali Madi Almajwal: Writing – original draft, Resources, Methodology, and Investigation.
Adhikari, S., Schop, M., de Boer, I.J., and Huppertz, T. 2022. Protein quality in perspective: a review of protein quality metrics and their applications. Nutrients. 14(5):947. 10.3390/nu14050947
Alrosan, M., Almajwal, A.M., Al-Qaisi, A., Gammoh, S., Alu’datt, M.H., Al Qudsi, F.R., et al. 2024a. Evaluation of digestibility, solubility, and surface properties of trehalose-conjugated quinoa proteins prepared via pH shifting technique. Food Chem. 22:101397. 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101397
Alrosan, M., Almajwal, A.M., Al-Qaisi, A., Gammoh, S., Alu’datt, M.H., Al Qudsi, F.R., and Bani-Melhem, K. 2024b. Trehalose-conjugated lentil-casein protein complexes prepared by structural interaction: effects on water solubility and protein digestibility. Food Chem. 447(1):138882. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138882
Alrosan, M., Tan, T.C., Easa, A.M., Gammoh, S., and Alu’datt, M.H. 2022. Molecular forces governing protein–protein interaction: structure–function relationship of complexes protein in the food industry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutrit. 62(15):4036–4052. 10.1080/10408398.2021.1871589
Alrosan, M., Tan, T.C., Easa, A.M., Gammoh, S., Alu’datt, M.H., Kubow, S., and Al-Qaisi, A. 2023. Enhanced functionality of fermented whey protein using water kefir. Int J Food Prop. 26(1):1663–1677. 10.1080/10942912.2023.2225799
AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC, 19th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Rockville, MD, 2012.
Asen, N.D., and Aluko, R.E. 2022. Physicochemical and functional properties of membrane-fractionated heat-induced pea protein aggregates. Front Nutrit. 9:852225. 10.3389/fnut.2022.852225
Bondoc, I. 2007. Technology and quality control of milk and dairy products, vol. I. Iași: Ion Ionescu de la Brad University.
Bondoc, I., and Șindilar, E.V. 2002. Veterinary sanitary control of food quality and hygiene, vol. I. Iași: Ion Ionescu de la Brad University.
Chen, D., and Campanella, O.H. 2022. Limited enzymatic hydrolysis induced pea protein gelation at low protein concentration with less heat requirement. Food Hydrocoll. 128:107547. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107547
Chen, W., Lv, R., Muhammad, A.I., Guo, M., Ding, T., Ye, X., and Liu, D. 2019. Fabrication of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate carrier based on glycosylated whey protein isolate obtained by ultrasound Maillard reaction. Ultrason Sonochem. 58:104678. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104678
Cui, L., Kimmel, J., Zhou, L., Chen, B., and Rao, J. 2021. Improving the functionality of pea protein isolate through co-spray drying with emulsifying salt or disaccharide. Food Hydrocoll. 113:106534. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106534
Cui, H., Li, S., Roy, D., Guo, Q., and Ye, A. 2023. Modifying quinoa protein for enhanced functional properties and digestibility: a review. Curr Res Food Sci. 7:100604. 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100604
Dai, S., Lian, Z., Qi, W., Chen, Y., Tong, X., Tian, T., and Jiang, L. 2022. Non-covalent interaction of soy protein isolate and catechin: mechanism and effects on protein conformation. Food Chem. 384:132507. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132507
Ducel, V., Pouliquen, D., Richard, J., and Boury, F. 2008. 1H NMR relaxation studies of protein–polysaccharide mixtures. Int J Biol Macromol. 43(4):359–366. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.07.007
Figueroa-González J.J., Lobato-Calleros C., Vernon-Carter E.J., Aguirre-Mandujano, E., Alvarez-Ramirez, J., and Martínez-Velasco, A. 2022. Modifying the structure, physicochemical properties, and foaming ability of amaranth protein by dual pH-shifting and ultrasound treatments. Food Sci Technol (LWT). 153:112561. 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112561
Gao, W., Jiang, Z., Du, X., Zhang, F., Liu, Y., Bai, X., and Sun, G. 2020. Impact of surfactants on nanoemulsions based on fractionated coconut oil: emulsification stability and in vitro digestion. J Oleo Sci. 69(3):227–239. 10.5650/jos.ess19264
Hao, L., Sun, J., Pei, M., Zhang, G., Li, C., Li, C., and Liu, L. 2022. Impact of non-covalent bound polyphenols on conformational, functional properties and in vitro digestibility of pea protein. Food Chem. 383:132623. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132623
Huang, C., Blecker, C., Wei, X., Xie, X., Li, S., Chen, L., and Zhang, D. 2024. Effects of different plant polysaccharides as fat substitutes on the gel properties, microstructure and digestion characteristics of myofibrillar protein. Food Hydrocoll. 150:109717. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109717
Jiang, S., Ding, J., Andrade, J., Rababah, T.M., Almajwal, A., Abulmeaty, M.M., and Feng, H. 2017. Modifying the physicochemical properties of pea protein by pH-shifting and ultrasound combined treatments. Ultrason Sonochem. 38:835–842. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.03.046
Jiang, W., Wang, Y., Ma, C., McClements, D. J., Liu, F., and Liu, X. 2022. Pea protein isolate-inulin conjugates prepared by pH-shift treatment and ultrasonic-enhanced glycosylation: Structural and functional properties. Food Chemistry, 384, 132511. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132511
Ke, C., Liu, B., Dudu, O.E., Zhang, S., Meng, L., Wang, Y., and Yan, T. 2023. Modification of structural and functional characteristics of casein treated with quercetin via two interaction modes: covalent and non-covalent interactions. Food Hydrocoll. 137:108394. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108394
Li, J., Wu, M., Wang, Y., Li, K., Du, J., and Bai, Y. 2020. Effect of pH-shifting treatment on structural and heat induced gel properties of peanut protein isolate. Food Chem. 325:126921. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126921
Liu, Z., Ge, Y., Li, S., Wu, C., Hei, X., Ren, G., and Shi, A. 2024. The properties of plant-based protein particles with co-spray drying agents. J Food Eng. 371:111961. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.111961
Liu, J., Xie, J., Lin, J., Xie, X., Fan, S., Han, X., and Han, L. 2023. The material basis of astringency and the deastringent effect of polysaccharides: a review. Food Chem. 405:134946. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134946
Nourmohammadi, N., Campanella, O.H., and Chen, D. 2024. Effect of limited proteolysis and CaCl2 on the rheology, microstructure and in vitro digestibility of pea protein-carboxymethyl cellulose mixed gel. Food Res Int. 188:114474. 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114474
Soltanizadeh, N., Mirmoghtadaie, L., Nejati, F., Najafabadi, L.I., Heshmati, M.K., and Jafari, M. 2014. Solid-state protein–carbohydrate interactions and their application in the food industry. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safety. 13(5):860–870. 10.1111/1541-4337.12089
Sun, W., Tribuzi, G., and Bornhorst, G.M. 2023. Particle size and water content impact breakdown and starch digestibility of chickpea snacks during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Res Int. 173:113201. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113201
Tan, K.P., Singh, K., Hazra, A., and Madhusudhan, M.S. 2021. Peptide bond planarity constrains hydrogen bond geometry and influences secondary structure conformations. Curr Res Struct Biol. 3:1–8. 10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.11.002
Wang, S., Miao, S., and Sun, D.W. 2023. Modifying structural and techno-functional properties of quinoa proteins through extraction techniques and modification methods. Trends Food Sci Technol. 143:104285. 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104285
Xue, J., and Luo, Y. 2023. Protein-polysaccharide nanocomplexes as nanocarriers for delivery of curcumin: a comprehensive review on preparation methods and encapsulation mechanisms. J Future Foods. 3(2):99–114. 10.1016/j.jfutfo.2022.12.002
Yang, Y., He, S., Ye, Y., Cao, X., Liu, H., Wu, Z., and Sun, H. 2020. Enhanced hydrophobicity of soybean protein isolate by low-pH shifting treatment for the sub-micron gel particles preparation. Ind Crops Prod. 151:112475. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112475
Yildiz, G., Ding, J., Andrade, J., Engeseth, N. J., and Feng H. 2018. Effect of plant protein-polysaccharide complexes produced by mano-thermo-sonication and pH-shifting on the structure and stability of oil-in-water emulsions. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol (IFSET). 47:317–325. 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.03.005
Yue, Y., Pang, S., Li, N., Tong, L., Wang, L., Fan, B., and Liu, L. 2021. Interactions between pea protein isolate and carboxymethylcellulose in neutral and acid aqueous systems. Foods. 10(7):1560. 10.3390/foods10071560