Citrus fruits—oranges, lemons, and grapefruits—are produced and consumed in huge proportions around the globe which contain 91% water and the reason why they are regarded as the most hydrating fruits. Citrus fruits are a vital part of the human diet by providing the essential vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants to the body, but the process of citrus fruits production frequently utilizes the application of pesticides to deal with pests and diseases. Pesticide residues, including chlorpyrifos, carbofuran, cyhalothrin, and bifenthrin, in the fruit can still have an effect on consumers’ health. In this study, the process of ozonation was used to remove pesticide residues from citrus fruits such as in oranges, lemons, and grapefruits. Ozonated water helped in the detection and removal of pesticides residues chlorpyrifos, carbofuran, cyhalothrin, and bifenthrin from citrus fruits. The mean residual level of chlorpyrifos was 0.015 ± 0.004 in oranges, 0.014 ± 0.004 in lemons, and 0.022 ± 0.001 in grapefruits; the bifenthrin level was 0.055 ± 0.004 in oranges, 0.055 ± 0.004 in lemons, and 0.054 ± 0.005 in grapefruits; the lambda-cyhalothrin level was 1.104 ± 0.174 in oranges, 1.056 ± 0.210 in lemons, and 1.208 ± 0.172 in grapefruits; and the carbofuran level was 0.625 ± 0.050 in oranges, 0.616 ± 0.046 in lemons, and 0.616 ± 0.050 in grapefruits. Furthermore, residual percentages of chlorpyrifos, carbofuran, cyhalothrin, and bifenthrin were detected in all citrus fruits, with the results showing that maximum levels of pesticide residues were efficiently removed from citrus fruits at 10 ppm (parts per million) ozonation without any poisoning and deterioration of fruits.
Key words: chlorpyrifos, carbofuran, cyhalothrin, bifenthrin residues, citrus, ozonated water
*Corresponding Author: Tariq Aziz, Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University Shenzhen, Guangdong, Shenzhen, China. Email: [email protected]
Academic Editor: Prof. Massimiliano Rinaldi, University of Parma, Province of Parma, Italy
Received: 5 December 2024; Accepted: 29 May 2025; Published: 1 July 2025
© 2025 Codon Publications
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
The economic impact of the agriculture sector on profits after the independence of Pakistan was significant, which resulted in almost 21% gross domestic product (GDP) and provided employment to 45% people. Almost 63% of the population lived in rural areas and made their living in a direct or indirect manner from agricultural sources (Raza et al., 2012). Agriculture plays a vital role in the provision of food for existing and rising population, raw material for agribusiness, and for the export revenues. The main subsectors in the agriculture industry are major and minor crops, forestry, live stocks, and fisheries (Jiang and China, 2016). The major pillar of a country’s economy is agricultural production. For a balanced diet, the people of Pakistan are more likely to ingest vegetables and fruits. Exporting vegetables and fruits to foreign states, like India, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, UAE, and England, are a great source for earning foreign currencies (Syed et al., 2014). A healthy lifestyle can be had by consuming fruits and vegetables due to the high contents of vitamin A, vitamin C, minerals, phytochemicals, electrolytes, antioxidants, and dietary fiber they contain (Yahia et al., 2019). They are also rich in bioactive compounds which offer more health benefits by preventing certain illnesses. (Albuquerque et al., 2020).
Health advantages of fruits and vegetables are lowering cancer risk, boosting brain ability, protecting bones, immune system, teeth, heart, urinary tract, eyesight, aging, and reducing elevated cholesterol levels (Saeid et al., 2021; Islam et al., 2021). Based on the nutritional profile, vitamin A in fruits and vegetables help in reducing the occurrence of night blindness (Kaparapu et al., 2020) plant-based foods containing a high amount of vitamin C help in digestion and boost immunity (Khalid et al., 2022). Over the last two decades, there has been a comparatively sustained increase in the output of citrus all over the world. According to the most recent report by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA, 2022) on the international citrus markets and trade, favorable weather in Brazil and Turkey is expected to boost orange production globally for 2021/2022, predicted to reach 49.0 million tons over the previous year. Brazil is the top producer of oranges with 16.91 million tons, followed by China with 7.55, European Union with 6.10, Mexico with 4.28, and United States with 3.46 (Ben Hsouna et al., 2023).
Tropical and subtropical regions of various countries are the known areas to produce citrus fruits, with a significant production in Pakistan, Japan, Brazil, the United States, China, Mexico, and the Mediterranean areas. Around 1.9 million tons of citrus fruits are annually produced in Pakistan (Zhong and Nicolosi, 2020); sweet oranges, grapefruits, Mandarins, and lemons are the most cultivated citrus varieties (Hamid et al., 2024). Here, people mostly consume plant-based foods which account for almost 60% of their daily energy intake. Pakistan is blessed with an adequate supply of quality vegetables and fruits to overcome the shortage of basic food items. Citrus fruits contain high amounts of vitamin A, B, and C, essential minerals such as phosphorus, iron, calcium, and zinc, and an ample amount of carbohydrates, especially necessary for their metabolic activities which are fundamental to human health (Abakpa and Adenaike, 2021).
Different technical packs are used to prevent insect attacks and protect fruit quality during citrus production. As various citrus species contain pesticide residues, several physicochemical, biochemical, and mechanical inputs allow the residues to disperse (Sun et al., 2016). Today, researchers are emphasizing on organic farming to reduce the use of pesticides on citrus production (Kowalska et al., 2022). Various techniques can be used to eliminate the contaminants of pesticides, including cleaning with water and lower the entanglement of chemical solutions like ozone, chlorine, salts, hydrogen peroxide, and detergents; also, other parameters such as pH (potential of hydrogen), oxidation, temperature, metabolism, hydrolysis, depletion, and photolysis can be used to degrade pesticides (Pandiselvam et al., 2020).
Organophosphorus pesticide (OP) and chlorpyrifos (CPS) are the chemicals used for protecting citrus fruits by killing insects and worms (Foong et al., 2020). Ozonation is a proven method for degrading various types of pesticide residues from citrus fruits, due to the fact that ozone oxidizes pesticides by breaking the chemical links in their molecules, confirming that they can no longer be harmful for human health. Ozone treatment with zero residues outcomes are utilized in food product sanitization, air quality improvement, and general disinfectant due to its ability to breakdown pesticides (Díaz-López et al., 2022). In the agricultural production, and since the physicochemical properties of fruits are not altered, ozone is used to degrade pesticide residues during postharvest storage (de Souza et al., 2018). The most appealing features of ozone are: its quick decomposition in molecular oxygen without leaving any trace and low concentrations of ozone can be used for the protection of surfaces from any fungal growth and infection (Liang et al., 2021). The aim of this study was to extract pesticide residues from citrus fruits with the quantification of these residues and using ozonation for the removal of carbofuran, cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, and bifenthrin residues from citrus fruits.
Insecticides selected for ozonation were carbofuran (Furadan, 3% G, FMC), chlorpyrifos (Lorsban®, 40 EC, Dow Agro-Sciences), bifenthrin (Talstar® 100 g a.i./l EC; FMC), and cyhalothrin (Karate® 2.5 EC Syngenta, Switzerland) and acetonitrile chemical was procured from JK enterprises (Karachi, Pakistan). Sweet oranges, lemons, and grapefruits were obtained from the market and the nearby fields in Multan, Pakistan and transported to the processing laboratory of the Institute of food Science and Nutrition Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan. Fruits were kept at the required temperature and humidity. Ozone generator was used to produce ozone and ozone concentrations were evaluated by titration (Wang et al., 2022).
Tap water was used to wash samples of lemons, grapefruits, and oranges and then cut into slices. All prepared matrices of citrus fruits were subjected to the analysis for pesticide residues.
The analytical standard of pesticide was used to prepare pesticide solutions (chlorpyrifos, cyhalothrin, carbofuran, and bifenthrin) as solvent. Pesticide solution of 10 L was prepared by using tap water where each pesticide had a concentration of 200mg/L (Swami et al., 2021).
Matrices of 2 kg citrus fruits—lemons, oranges, and grapefruits—were dipped into a prepared solution of pesticides for a duration of 5 minutes. Later, the sample was sundried for 10 minutes and blended in the food processor of GABA National (GN-920, Japan) for 5 minutes. QuEChERS analytical method was used for easy, cost-effective, and safe extraction of loaded pesticides on matrices. Concentrations of pesticides from fruit samples were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Lehotay, 2007).
For the extraction of pesticide, 500 g of clamshell was mixed in a blender for 2 minutes; 3 g of parent mixture was poured into a tube, when 12 mL distilled water was added; later, all the chemicals were mixed in a vortex tube for 2 minutes. After a gentle shaking of the tube, it was placed in the centrifuge at 4000 rpm for 2 minutes. In another tube, 8 mL of supernatant was added, after which 1.2 mg magnesium sulfate and 0.4 g Primary and Secondary Amines (PSA) were added gradually. After shaking the sample and performing centrifugation, 1 mL supernatant was added into the vial with 4 mL water and methanol. The prepared solution was then added to HPLC in which 20 μl sample was used.
A corona discharge (Xetin ozone air and water purifier, Model-XT301, Taiwan) was used to generate ozone gas (100 ppm at air flowrate of 2.5 L/minute and 32.10 mg/hour ozone output). To guarantee unswerving ozone production output, the ozone generator was warmed up for 15 minutes before the experiment. The levels of dissolved gas were measured using a portable ozone detector (DO3, Echo Sensors Inc., USA) with an accuracy of 0.01 mg/L in the range of 0–10 mg/L; the dissolved ozone was 0.054 mg/L.
A total of 30 L tap water was used for ozonation in a reactor at 10°C. Then 1 kg matrices consisting of pesticide were added in the ozonated water for 5 minutes in the required concentrations of 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm. Citrus slices were then sun-dried after the completion of ozonation procedure.
For the evaluation of pesticides persistent concentrations in samples, 1 kg of ozonated matrix was separated out regimented in the food processor. After homogenization, the organic layer of pesticide was extracted from the 15 g of sample taken, according to the QuEChERS method for HPLC study (Gonzalez-Curbelo et al., 2022).
Pesticide levels were identified and quantified by ultraviolet (UV) visible detector and HPLC was used to analyze aliquots. Separation was performed by C18 (a straight-chain alkane with 18 carbon atoms) (250 × 4.6 mm i.d) and UV 254 nm reversed phase column using the direct gradient of solvent at the adjustment of 0.3 mL/minute. The limit of detection for target compounds was in the range of 1.5 μg/kg to 10 μg/kg. Deionized water was denoted as A: acetonitrile as solvent B (70:30, v/v [volume per volume]) with 20 μl volume of injection. To the UV visible wavelengths, calibration of pesticide detectors was initiated at 242 nm. For the identification of the residue, retaining time of pesticide residues was compared with reference standards. Determination of the reduction percentage was done by comparing the concentrations of pesticides residue in ozonated water for washed fruits to those for the unwashed (Vuthijumnonk and Shimbhanao, 2019).
The subjected data or treatments were performed in triplicate for each commodity and the result was investigated using ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), which was depicted as mean ± standard deviation (SD) at a significance of 0.05 or less. All the chemometric calculations were done by applying the statistics package of the program (Engle and Granger, 1987).
Lemons, oranges, and grapefruits were selected for the determination of pesticide residues after spraying and before ozonation. The supreme residue limit of bifenthrin, chlorpyrifos, carbofuran, and lambda-cyhalothrin were 0.05 ppm, 0.01 ppm, 0.5 ppm, and 1 ppm, respectively (Table 1). Different pesticides residues were detected in different concentrations in these citrus fruits when the concentration of ozonated water changed. The mean residual level of chlorpyrifos in oranges, lemons, and grapefruits was 0.015, 0.014, and 0.022, respectively (Figure 1). The bifenthrin pesticide’s concentration in oranges and lemons was similar (0.055) and 0.054 was observed in grapefruits. The mean residual level of lambda-cyhalothrin was 1.104 in oranges, 1.056 in lemons, and 1.208 in grapefruits; the mean residual level of carbofuran was 0.625 in oranges and 0.616 in lemons as well as in grapefruits. Pesticide residues that are highly soluble, wobbly, and weakly bound to the fruit surface are removed more easily, whereas fat-soluble, stable, and strongly adsorbed entail intensive treatments (Dhankhar et al., 2023). Likewise, fruits with smooth, nonwaxy, and thick peels consent higher removal percentages of pesticides residues as compared to porous, waxy, or thin-skinned fruits or vegetables (Lemic et al., 2025; Osman et al., 2024). Combining multiple techniques, such as ozonation followed by rinsing or surfactant washes, often yield the highest pesticide removal efficiency (Pal and Kioka, 2025).
Table 1. Detection of pesticide residues in fruit samples.
Fruit Sample | Pesticide | (Mean ± SD) |
---|---|---|
Oranges | Chlorpyrifos | 0.015 ±0.004 |
Bifenthrin | 0.055 ±0.004 | |
Lambda-Cyhalothrin | 1.104 ±0.174 | |
Carbofuran | 0.625 ±0.050 | |
Lemons | Chlorpyrifos | 0.014 ±0.004 |
Bifenthrin | 0.055 ±0.004 | |
Lambda-Cyhalothrin | 1.056 ±0.210 | |
Carbofuran | 0.616 ±0.046 | |
Grapefruits | Chlorpyrifos | 0.022 ±0.001 |
Bifenthrin | 0.054 ±0.005 | |
Lambda-Cyhalothrin | 1.208 ±0.172 | |
Carbofuran | 0.616 ±0.050 |
Figure 1. Chlorpyrifos, bifenthrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, and carbofuran residues treated with different ozone concentrations on oranges.
Nontreated fruits were found to have maximum residues of chlorpyrifos, whereas the minimum levels of residues were obtained when fruits were treated with a higher dose of ozone. The results of the ozonated oranges were found to be significant (p < 0.05) for the reduction of pesticides; chlorpyrifos residue decreased noticeably, that is, 49.8%, 48.8%, and 100% at 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm of ozone from oranges, respectively. Likewise, bifenthrin residues were significantly reduced after ozonation as compared to nontreated oranges; the maximum decline (97.6%) in residue was notified at a higher dose of 10 ppm ozone while minimum levels (68.4%) of residue were investigated at 5 ppm. Moreover, bifenthrin removal at 8 ppm was slightly lower (97.2%) than the 10 ppm ozone solution (Figure 2). Similarly, the results for lambda-cyhalothrin indicated significant decline with an increased range of ozone, that is, 10.7%, 36.5%, and 75.8% at 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm of ozone in oranges.
Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms of chlorpyrifos for oranges. A: Grade standard of chlorpyrifos; B: Oranges contaminated with chlorpyrifos before ozonation; C: Oranges contaminated with chlorpyrifos after ozonation.
These results were in accordance with the study proposed by Wu et al. (2019): by using the method of ozonation, the removal percentages for all these pesticide residues from spinach were similar. For the removal of carbofuran residues from oranges, different concentrations of ozone were used. Carbofuran residues were significantly reduced after ozonation while using different concentrations of ozone. Nontreated fruits were found to have maximum residues; however, elevated ozone concentration in the experiment resulted in the reduction of pesticide residues of carbofuran. Removal percentages for carbofuran were 31.3%, 69.2%, and 100% at 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm, respectively, of ozone from oranges. In the results supported by Pandiselvam et al. (2020), 100% chlorothalonil residues were removed by using 10 ppm ozone, followed by 98.5% tetradifon and 94.4% chlorpyrifos ethyl from citrus fruits.
The results for chlorpyrifos residues were found to be significant for the reduction of pesticides in lemons at different concentrations of ozone as compared to nontreated lemons. The maximum decline of pesticides was indicated at 10 ppm ozone level while the lowest removal was notified at 5 ppm (Figure 5).
Figure 3. HPLC chromatograms of bifenthrin for oranges. A: Grade standard of bifenthrin; B: Oranges contaminated with bifenthrin before ozonation; C: Oranges contaminated with bifenthrin after ozonation.
Figure 4. HPLC chromatograms of lambda-cyhalothrin for oranges. A: Grade standard of lambda-cyhalothrin; B: Oranges contaminated with lambda-cyhalothrin before ozonation; C: Oranges contaminated with lambda-cyhalothrin after ozonation.
Figure 5. Chlorpyrifos, bifenthrin, carbofuran, and lambda-cyhalothrin residues on lemons treated with different ozone concentrations.
Bifenthrin residues were found to have removal percentages of 61.7, 95.8, and 98.1 at 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm of ozone, respectively. Cyhalothrin residues were significantly reduced after ozonation and percentages for the removal of lambda-cyhalothrin were obtained as 38.4%, 61.7%, and 82.1% at 5 ppm, 8 ppm and 10 ppm of ozone, respectively. Similarly, carbofuran residues were significantly reduced after ozonation while using different concentrations of ozone and removal percentages were determined as 31.1%, 71.9%, and 100% at 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm of ozone, respectively. A study by Swami et al. (2021) supported these outcomes as it revealed that pesticide residues were removed from a variety of citrus fruits when treated with ozone water. Likewise, an earlier study by Siddique et al. (2021) investigated the impact of sonolytic ozonation to degrade pesticides residues in fruits and vegetables; the results showed significant decline in the mean residues of thiamethoxam, imidachloprid, acetamiprid, thiachloprid, and carbendazim, that is, 99.3%, 52.6%, 65.2%, 87.3%, and 72%, respectively, in time optimization range from 5 minutes to 15 minutes.
Residues of chlorpyrifos were found to have removal percentages of 61.2, 44.1, and 100 at 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm of ozone, respectively (Figure 9). Similarly, bifenthrin residues were reduced significantly as compared to nontreated fruits and the maximum residues of bifenthrin found to have removal percentages of 68.9, 98.1, and 96.8 at 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm of ozone, respectively. Furthermore, removal percentages of cyhalothrin residues were found as 39.9% for 5 ppm, 64.2% for 8 ppm, and 80.2% for 10 ppm of ozone in grapefruits, respectively. Carbofuran residues were also removed from grapefruits at various ozone concentrations and significant reduction in residues indicated 41.1%, 99%, and 100% at 5 ppm, 8 ppm, and 10 ppm of ozone, respectively. A study by Shakouri et al. (2014) revealed that thalonil pesticide residues were removed by ozonation without effecting the quality of food commodities. Similarly, Özen et al. (2021) observed the ozone treatment effect to remove pesticides residues in green peppers where the outcomes demonstrated significant decline in residue: 70.08%, 84.80%, and 100% for acetamiprid, malathion, and emamectin benzoate, respectively. In another study by Li et al. (2024) demonstrated the pesticide residues removal with ozone microbubbles and results showed significant decline or removal of azoxystrobin, emamectin benzoate, difenoconazole, and boscalid under long washing (18 minutes).
Figure 6. HPLC chromatograms of chlorpyrifos for lemons. A: Grade standard of chlorpyrifos; B: Lemon contaminated with chlorpyrifos before ozonation; C: Lemon contaminated with chlorpyrifos after ozonation.
Figure 7. HPLC chromatograms of bifenthrin for lemons. A: Grade standard of bifenthrin; B: Lemons contaminated with bifenthrin before ozonation; C: Lemons contaminated with bifenthrin after ozonation.
Figure 8. HPLC chromatograms of carbofuran for lemons. A: Grade standard of carbofuran; B: Lemons contaminated with carbofuran before ozonation; C: Lemons contaminated with carbofuran after ozonation.
Figure 9. Chlorpyrifos, bifenthrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, and carbofuran residues on grapefruits treated with different ozone concentrations.
Figure 10. HPLC chromatograms of chlorpyrifos for grapefruits. A: Grade standard of chlorpyrifos; B: Grapefruits contaminated with chlorpyrifos before ozonation; C: Grapefruits contaminated with chlorpyrifos after ozonation.
Figure 11. HPLC chromatograms of lambda-cyhalothrin for grapefruits. A: Grade standard of lambda-cyhalothrin; B: Grapefruits contaminated with lambda-cyhalothrin before ozonation; C: Grapefruits contaminated with lambda-cyhalothrin after ozonation.
Figure 12. HPLC chromatograms of carbofuran for grapefruits. A: Grade standard of carbofuran; B: Grapefruits contaminated with carbofuran before ozonation; C: Grapefruits contaminated with carbofuran after ozonation.
In this advanced era of food industries, several concerns create barriers to saturate consumers’ demand for food—healthy and high-quality food with zero hazards. To overcome this issue, consistent monitoring at every stage should be ensured, which is only possible when advanced technologies support the concept of food safety; ozonation is one that is cheap as well as assist in removing pesticides from food products, including meat, fruits, and vegetables (up to 100%) without effecting the sensory, nutritional, and physicochemical properties (Dubey et al., 2022). However, it has certain drawbacks in contrast to other techniques—it is less effective against organochlorines (as compared to washing saline solution) and can lead to fruit damage if optimal conditions are not ensured like exposure time, pH, and various types of fruits (Botondi et al., 2021; Gonçalves-Magalhães et al., 2025). For instant, it can decrease concentration of vitamin C and polyphenols and brings down the nutritional value of fruits and can be harmful on reacting with pesticides (Kaur et al., 2022). Furthermore, active carbon filtration, thermal processing, and hydrogen peroxide or chlorine can degrade potential food pesticides residues, but at the same time can be impractical in encountering the concerns for food texture and chemical composition (Pandiselvam et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022).
Ozone treatment is usually considered safe by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and approved as a food additive by the USDA for pesticide degradation. The European Union also permits ozone use for food processing with specification that it does not leave harmful residues.
Fruits and vegetables play an important part of daily diet for humans. Unfortunately, as these plants are not handled well, pesticide residues remain dominant in causing serious ailments and lifetime health concerns. Usage of pesticide and its detrimental effects largely affect crops and livestock, thus destroying the food production systems. The aim of this study was to remove trouble-causing pesticide residues from the citrus fruits. The results showed that maximum levels of pesticide residues were removed from citrus fruits at 10 ppm ozonation without any poisoning and worsening conditions of fruits. As a developing process, the quality of food products can be improved with the use of different ozonation methods when contaminated with any harmful agent. By protecting fruits from pesticides, it is possible to get rid of pesticide-induced chronic diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurological ailments.
The authors had no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.
All authors contributed equally to this article.
The authors declare no conflict of Interest.
Authors are thankful to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2025R437), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abakpa GO, Adenaike O. Antioxidant compounds and health benefits of citrus fruits. Eur J Nutr Food Saf. 2021;13(2):65–74. 10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i230376
Albuquerque TG, Nunes MA, Bessada SM, Costa HS, Oliveira MBP. Biologically active and health promoting food components of nuts, oilseeds, fruits, vegetables, cereals, and legumes. J Food Chem. 2020;12:609–56. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813266-1.00014-0
Ben Hsouna A, Sadaka C, Generalic Mekinic I, Garzoli S, Svarc-Gajic J, Rodrigues F, et al. The chemical variability, nutraceutical value, and food-industry and cosmetic applications of citrus plants: A critical review. Antioxidants. 2023;12(2):481. 10.3390/antiox12020481
Botondi R, Barone M, Grasso C. A review into the effectiveness of ozone technology for improving the safety and preserving the quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Foods. 2021;10(4):748. 10.3390/foods10040748
de Souza LP, Faroni LRDA, Heleno FF, Cecon PR, Gonçalves TDC, da Silva GJ, Prates LHF. Effects of ozone treatment on postharvest carrot quality. LWT. 2018;90:53–60. 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.11.057
Dhankhar J, Mehla R, Kundu P. Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Milk and Milk Products. In: The Chemistry of Milk and Milk Products. Point Pleasant, NJ, USA: Apple Academic Press; 2023. 331–59 pp. 10.1201/9781003340706-20
Díaz-López M, Siles JA, Ros C, Bastida F, Nicolás E. The effects of ozone treatments on the agro-physiological parameters of tomato plants and the soil microbial community. Sci Total Environ. 2022;812:151429. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151429
Dubey P, Singh A, Yousuf O. (2022). Ozonation: An evolving disinfectant technology for the food industry. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2022;15(9):2102–13. 10.1007/s11947-022-02876-3
Engle RF and Granger CWJ. Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica. 1987;55(2): 251–276. 10.2307/1913236
Foong SY, Ma NL, Lam SS, Peng W, Low F, Lee BH, et al. A recent global review of hazardous chlorpyrifos pesticide in fruit and vegetables: Prevalence, remediation and actions needed. J Hazard Mater. 2020;400:1–10. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123006
Gonçalves-Magalhães C, D’Antonino Faroni LR, Cecon PR, de Alencar ER, Silva MVDA, Aparecida Zinato Rodrigues A. Potential of ozonated mist for microbiological disinfection and preservation of the physicochemical quality of strawberries. Ozone Sci Eng. 2025:1–15. 10.1080/01919512.2025.2454934
Gonzalez-Curbelo MA, Varela-Martínez DA, Riano-Herrera DA. Pesticide-residue analysis in soils by the QuEChERS method: A review. Molecules. 2022;27(13):20–30. 10.3390/molecules27134323
Hamid S, Sharma K, Kumar K, Thakur A. Types and Cultivation of Citrus Fruits. Citrus Fruits and Juice: Processing and Quality Profiling. Singapore: Springer; 2024. 17–43 pp. 10.1007/978-981-99-8699-6_2
Islam SU, Ahmed MB, Ahsan H, Lee YS. Recent molecular mechanisms and beneficial effects of phytochemicals and plant-based whole foods in reducing LDL-C and preventing cardiovascular disease. Antioxidants. 2021;10(5):1–10. 10.3390/antiox10050784
Jiang Y, China C. Economic perspectives of major food crops of Pakistan: An econometric analysis. JASA. 2016;11:18–23.
Kaparapu J, Pragada PM, Geddada MNR. (2020). Fruits and vegetables and its nutritional benefits. In: Egbuna C, Tupas GD, editors. Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals Bioactive Components, Formulations and Innovations. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer; 2020. 241–60 pp. 10.1007/978-3-030-42319-3_14
Kaur K, Pandiselvam R, Kothakota A, Ishwarya SP, Zalpouri R, Mahanti NK. Impact of ozone treatment on food polyphenols–A comprehensive review. Food Control. 2022;142:109207. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109207
Khalid W, Arshad MS, Ranjha MMAN, Rozanska MB, Irfan S, Shafique B, et al. Functional constituents of plant-based foods boost immunity against acute and chronic disorders. Open Life Sci. 2022;17(1):1075–93. 10.1515/biol-2022-0104
Kowalska G, Pankiewicz U, Kowalski R. Assessment of pesticide content in apples and selected citrus fruits subjected to simple culinary processing. Appl Sci. 2022;12(3):1417. 10.3390/app12031417
Lehotay SJ. Determination of Pesticide Residues in Foods by Acetonitrile Extraction and Partitioning with Magnesium Sulfate: Collaborative Study. J. of AOAC Int. 2007;90(2): 485–520. 10.1093/jaoac/90.2.485
Lemic D, Zorić B, Novak A, Ivić D, Galešić MA, Viric Gasparic H. The effectiveness of ozone technology application in extending the shelf life of berry fruit. Appl Fruit Sci. 2025;67(1):1–10. 10.1007/s10341-025-01278-x
Li X, Liu C, Liu F, Zhang X, Chen X, Peng Q, Zhao, Z et al. Substantial removal of four pesticide residues in three fruits with ozone microbubbles. Food Chem. 2024;441:138293. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.138293
Liang Z, Xu X, Cao R, Wan Q, Xu H, Wang J, et al. Synergistic effect of ozone and chlorine on inactivating fungal spores: Influencing factors and mechanisms. J Hazard Mater. 2021;420:126–30. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126610
Osman KA, Mohamed HHE, Salama MS. Ozone treatment as a green technology for removing chlorpyrifos residues from vegetables and its impact on the quality of vegetables. Ozone Sci Eng. 2024;46(6):558–72. 10.1080/01919512.2024.2404060
Özen T, Koyuncu MA, Erbaş D. Effect of ozone treatments on the removal of pesticide residues and postharvest quality in green pepper. J Food Sci Technol. 2021;58(6):2186–96. 10.1007/s13197-020-04729-3
Pandiselvam R, Kaavya R, Jayanath Y, Veenuttranon K, Lueprasitsakul P, Divya V, et al. Ozone as a novel emerging technology for the dissipation of pesticide residues in foods: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020;97:38–54. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.017
Pal P, Kioka A. Micro and nanobubbles enhanced ozonation technology: A synergistic approach for pesticides removal. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2025;24(2):e70133. 10.1111/1541-4337.70133
Pandiselvam R, Kaavya R, Khanashyam AC, Divya V, Abdullah SK, Aurum FS, et al. Research trends and emerging physical processing technologies in mitigation of pesticide residues on various food products. ESPR. 2022;29(30):45131–49. 10.1007/s11356-022-20338-3
Costat Version 2.0 (1986). Costat Statistical Package for Analysis of Variance, Version 2. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Cohort Software.
Raza SA, Ali Y, Mehboob F. Role of agriculture in economic growth of Pakistan. 2012;24:1–10.
Saeid A, Ahmed M. (2021). Citrus fruits: Nutritive value and value-added products. Citrus Res Dev Biotechnol. 2021;16:1–10.
Shakouri A, Yazdanpanah H, Shojaee MH. Kobarfard F. Method development for simultaneous determination of 41 pesticides in rice using LC-MS/MS technique and its application for the analysis of 60 rice samples collected from Tehran market. Iran J Pharm Res. 2014;13:27–30.
Siddique Z, Malik AU, Asi MR, Inam-ur-Raheem M, Abdullah M. Impact of sonolytic ozonation (O3/US) on degradation of pesticide residues in fresh vegetables and fruits: Case study of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021;79:105799. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105799
Sun D, Zhu Y, Pang J, Zhou Z, Jiao B. (2016). Residue level, persistence and safety of spirodiclofen–pyridaben mixture in citrus fruits. Food Chem. 2016;194:805–10. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.044
Swami S, Kumar B, Singh SB. Effect of ozone application on the removal of pesticides from grapes and green bell peppers and changes in their nutraceutical quality. J Environ Sci Health B. 2021;56(8):722–30. 10.1080/03601234.2021.1940660
Syed JH, Alamdar A, Mohammad A, Ahad K, Shabir Z, Ahmed H, et al. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Pakistan: A review of the occurrence and associated human health risks. ESPR. 2014;21:13367–93. 10.1007/s11356-014-3117-z
USDA. Citrus: World Markets and Trade. (2022). 1–13.
Vuthijumnonk J, Shimbhanao W. Removal of cyfluthrin by fine bubble technology in oranges (Citrus reticulata Blanco). IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2019;16:30–4. 10.1088/1755-1315/346/1/012036
Wang LK, Wang MHS. Ozone residual determination or total oxidant determination by iodometric titration-assisted spectrophotometry. Environ. Sci Technol Eng Math. 2022;56:1–56.
Wu Y, An Q, Li D, Wu J, Pan C. Comparison of different home/commercial washing strategies for ten typical pesticide residue removal effects in kumquat, spinach and cucumber. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:1–15. 10.3390/ijerph16030472
Yahia EM, García-Solís P, Celis MEM. Contribution of fruits and vegetables to human nutrition and health. In: Postharvest physiology and biochemistry of fruits and vegetables. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. 19–45 pp. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813278-4.00002-6
Zhang AA, Sutar PP, Bian Q, Fang XM, Ni JB, Xiao HW. Pesticide residue elimination for fruits and vegetables: The mechanisms, applications, and future trends of thermal and non-thermal technologies. J Future Foods. 2022;2(3):223–40. 10.1016/j.jfutfo.2022.06.004
Zhong G, Nicolosi E. Citrus origin, diffusion, and economic importance. Citrus Genome. 2020;5:5–21. 10.1007/978-3-030-15308-3_2